I bought the earlier versione named 2.46 years ago and i do have the manual. If you are so interested this version did cost to me around 230 € here.
A German radio ham gave me a recent version that is the 2.50 but without any manual.
I am waiting to receive manual or instruction from him soon.
Speaking from a more actractive point of view, I am interest in implementing the program using the new "long" capability of the basic. I will try to modify the program.
I stand here!
Any help is appreciated.
Regards,
Ambro
By the time the Fachisi in the E U get done taxing that $25 it will be $75, I wonder if that GERMAN HAM would be so quick to share if M E Labs were a German company.
BTW mackrackit<font color=green><b> that statement is a bit of an oxymoron</b></font color> wouldn't you say?
If you do not believe in MAGIC, Consider how currency has value simply by printing it, and is then traded for real assets.
.
Gold is the money of kings, silver is the money of gentlemen, barter is the money of peasants - but debt is the money of slaves
.
There simply is no "Happy Spam" If you do it you will disappear from this forum.
Yep
Kind of like bacterial soap.
Dave
Always wear safety glasses while programming.
Off topic...sorry
....E U get done taxing that $25 it will be $75....
You're right! Tax is the buzz word here at present. UK diesel price about $12 gallon, at present conversion rates. Tax rate on fuel is over 150% and set to rise in October. Hold onto your hats!!
Adrian
It seems to me that the forum argument now is the update to version 2.50 of the old version of the pbp that i bought in the past year. I have not pay for the update : we are two radio hams both working on the same NON PROFIT DDS control at radio Ham level only. I really do not think to be "illegal" since the other radio ham did pay for the update.
But I am understanding ( if I am not wrong .. English is my second language that i do not know well ) I am not receiving technical help because of the illegality.
If it is like this, I could consider to pay 25 USD for the update that I already have .
Our target is to have the DDS control working for the Analog devices AD9912 chip.
I am also convinced that most of the people who read the forum are more interestd on the real technical aspects.
Anyway,
thanks to the people on the forum.
Ambro
Bookmarks