Problems with mpasm


Closed Thread
Results 1 to 34 of 34

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Wellton, U.S.A.
    Posts
    5,924


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by iw2fvo View Post
    I bought the earlier versione named 2.46 years ago and i do have the manual. If you are so interested this version did cost to me around 230 € here.
    A German radio ham gave me a recent version that is the 2.50 but without any manual.
    I am waiting to receive manual or instruction from him soon.

    Speaking from a more actractive point of view, I am interest in implementing the program using the new "long" capability of the basic. I will try to modify the program.
    I stand here!
    Any help is appreciated.
    Regards,
    Ambro
    At least you are honest about having an illegal copy.

    Why not just spend the $25.00 USD and upgrade?

    Then you will have a manual.
    Dave
    Always wear safety glasses while programming.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Look, behind you.
    Posts
    2,818


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mackrackit View Post
    <font color=green><b>At least you are honest about having an illegal copy.</font color></b>

    Why not just spend the $25.00 USD and upgrade?

    Then you will have a manual.
    By the time the Fachisi in the E U get done taxing that $25 it will be $75, I wonder if that GERMAN HAM would be so quick to share if M E Labs were a German company.
    BTW mackrackit<font color=green><b> that statement is a bit of an oxymoron</b></font color> wouldn't you say?
    If you do not believe in MAGIC, Consider how currency has value simply by printing it, and is then traded for real assets.
    .
    Gold is the money of kings, silver is the money of gentlemen, barter is the money of peasants - but debt is the money of slaves
    .
    There simply is no "Happy Spam" If you do it you will disappear from this forum.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Wellton, U.S.A.
    Posts
    5,924


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Yep
    Kind of like bacterial soap.
    Dave
    Always wear safety glasses while programming.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Suffolk, UK
    Posts
    59


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Off topic...sorry

    ....E U get done taxing that $25 it will be $75....

    You're right! Tax is the buzz word here at present. UK diesel price about $12 gallon, at present conversion rates. Tax rate on fuel is over 150% and set to rise in October. Hold onto your hats!!

    Adrian

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Varese , Italy
    Posts
    326


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default mpasm problem

    It seems to me that the forum argument now is the update to version 2.50 of the old version of the pbp that i bought in the past year. I have not pay for the update : we are two radio hams both working on the same NON PROFIT DDS control at radio Ham level only. I really do not think to be "illegal" since the other radio ham did pay for the update.
    But I am understanding ( if I am not wrong .. English is my second language that i do not know well ) I am not receiving technical help because of the illegality.
    If it is like this, I could consider to pay 25 USD for the update that I already have .
    Our target is to have the DDS control working for the Analog devices AD9912 chip.
    I am also convinced that most of the people who read the forum are more interestd on the real technical aspects.
    Anyway,
    thanks to the people on the forum.
    Ambro

  6. #6
    skimask's Avatar
    skimask Guest


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by iw2fvo View Post
    we are two radio hams both working on the same NON PROFIT DDS
    The overwhelming vast majority of us here are NON PROFIT hobbyists here. We all pay the same amount for the same software (well most of us anyways). We all get to fork out the $250USD (plus any applicable taxes) for the same product, the same support, the same everything. I don't think anybody here is any more special than anybody else (with a few exceptions).

    On the back of the first page of the manual, there is a statement:

    "Use of the PICBASIC PRO Compiler without first obtaining a license is a violation of the law."

    Sounds fairly straight forward to me...

Similar Threads

  1. Moved from PM to MPASM and have fuse definition problems
    By Tomexx in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: - 26th November 2008, 22:27
  2. 12F675 MCLR directive MPASM
    By OLDSCHOOL in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: - 4th May 2008, 01:29
  3. MPASM 18F4550 getting started
    By BrianT in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: - 4th September 2007, 23:59
  4. MPASM problems
    By BrianT in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: - 31st August 2007, 01:29
  5. Converting to MPASM
    By btaylor in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: - 4th November 2005, 01:35

Members who have read this thread : 0

You do not have permission to view the list of names.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts