A header wizard

Closed Thread
Results 1 to 40 of 230

Thread: A header wizard

Hybrid View

  1. - 23rd September 2010, 04:46 #1
    mackrackit's Avatar
    mackrackit
    mackrackit is offline SuperMod
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Wellton, U.S.A.
    Posts
    5,924

    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Yup, day jobs can be a real pain

    Personally I like the first and second ways. How do you normally do it in your code?
    Dave
    Always wear safety glasses while programming.
  2. - 23rd September 2010, 04:50 #2
    prstein's Avatar
    prstein
    prstein is offline Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    USA, New England
    Posts
    164

    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mackrackit View Post
    How do you normally do it in your code?
    If I had to describe it in a single word I'd say "inconsistently." A combination of all three...

    Best Regards,
    Paul
  3. - 23rd September 2010, 10:28 #3
    cncmachineguy's Avatar
    cncmachineguy
    cncmachineguy is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Maryland, USA
    Posts
    869

    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    I like the first way best. third method is nice. second way not so much.
    -Bert

    The glass is not half full or half empty, Its twice as big as needed for the job!

    http://foamcasualty.com/ - Warbird R/C scratch building with foam!
  4. - 23rd September 2010, 11:17 #4
    Ioannis's Avatar
    Ioannis
    Ioannis is offline SuperMod
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    4,139

    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    If I have to vote, then 1-3.

    Ioannis
    www.signalcom.gr
  5. - 23rd September 2010, 18:06 #5
    circuitpro's Avatar
    circuitpro
    circuitpro is offline Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    156

    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Smile

    This project is GREAT! I look forward to using it.

    I vote #1.

    I'm thanking you in advance right now.
  6. - 24th September 2010, 08:41 #6
    Acetronics2's Avatar
    Acetronics2
    Acetronics2 is offline Fanatical Contributor
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    NW France
    Posts
    3,653

    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Hi, Paul

    There's a very important button Missing ....

    The " DONATE " button ...

    Worth it ... I Think !

    Alain
    ************************************************** ***********************
    Why insist on using 32 Bits when you're not even able to deal with the first 8 ones ??? ehhhhhh ...
    ************************************************** ***********************
    IF there is the word "Problem" in your question ...
    certainly the answer is " RTFM " or " RTFDataSheet " !!!
    *****************************************
  7. - 24th September 2010, 11:03 #7
    HenrikOlsson's Avatar
    HenrikOlsson
    HenrikOlsson is offline Contributor
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    3,612

    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Hi,
    Jumping in in the middle here....
    I definitely vote for #1. The other two consumes more codespace and takes longer to execute. The execution time may not matter much but saving codespace is good.

    A benefit of #2 (and #3) though is that you could include comments on a bit to bit basis which makes it easier to see what each bit does.

    /Henrik.
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Members who have read this thread : 0

You do not have permission to view the list of names.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Forum Rules