
Originally Posted by
mackrackit
I do not really have a good comparison but looking at the LST files between to similar programs. I have 2.50 on one machine and 2.6 on another.
The PBP 2.5 code is using 23196 Bytes
The PBP 2.6 code is using 16220 Bytes
Both are with an 18F4550
Nice! Two similar programs and you got a reduction of 30% out of 23196 Bytes from your PBP 2.50 program. That sounds very encouraging for me to upgrade to PBP 2.60
.
Robert
"No one is completely worthless. They can always serve as a bad example."
Anonymous
Bookmarks