Timeout function

[sayzer]

You could check 'Pause 1' for 1000 counts...that'll only lock up the program for 1 ms at a time, and end up giving a timeout of a bit over 1 second.

So the question is, does johnmiller want to have an independent counter running int the background? the sample code above seems to say "No".

If we follow the sample code above, then the same code logic would also work with PAUSE 1000 or Pause 1 with 1000 counts as Skimask said.

Tomato or Potaito.
or was it tomato or tomaito
-----------