Cheapest way to communicate


Closed Thread
Results 1 to 23 of 23

Hybrid View

  1. #1


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    What's the duration of the communications link?
    it is a 24/7 communication link, every second.

    Is it one-to-one or one-to-many?
    one-to-many

    What type of messages?
    short, status monitoring

    What's the terrain?
    Horizontal, maximum of 1 meter difference in elevation

    Stapled to tree trunks or utility poles, buried in a trench?
    Buried in a trench

    Must it be taut or can it sag?
    Can be sag

    Thank you!!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    86


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Probably the cheapest solution would be a 20 ma current loop circuit. 1 transistor (PN2222A), 1 opto-coupler (we use a 4n26) and a few resistors and you are set. I think I remember something about that being good for around 2000 feet, especially if you can go with a lower baud rate. Having said that, I would probably still go with RS422/485 just because it is more of a standard these days.

    David

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,073


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by koossa View Post
    one-to-many
    If you have to have a two-way communication with more than one node, I think RS-485 is the best choice. Two way wireless gets complcated and expensive rather quickly. Also, most jurisdictions have limts on how often a wireless node can transmit. B&B Electronics has an excellent whitepaper on RS-485.
    Last edited by dhouston; - 18th May 2009 at 21:49. Reason: added the wireless time limits

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,073


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Here's another helpful article on RS-485.Also, even if buried in a trench, you will need to protect against lightning by opto-isolating the nodes. See the ISOLATED LINK section of the Axelson article. You can use direct burial CAT5 cable to avoid the need for conduit.

    If you can provide more detail about the number of nodes and the nature of the messages we might be able to suggest less costly methods. It might be less costly to use WiFi which can be done for under $60 per node. It's inherently isolated and you can use serial communications.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,073


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    One caveat on the WiFi module. Its range is specified as up to 200m. That is in a straight, unobstructed line. YMWV

  6. #6


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Hi Dave

    Thank you very much for the info and links!!!

  7. #7
    imjames407's Avatar
    imjames407 Guest


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Walkie talkie

    i think Walkie talkie is the best option.

Similar Threads

  1. Communicate PC-to-PC using PIC
    By aje_azam in forum USB
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: - 16th March 2009, 07:35
  2. Making the Lab X1 communicate with the Lab X2
    By MatthewM in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: - 19th June 2008, 22:26
  3. Replies: 14
    Last Post: - 20th March 2008, 13:54
  4. Cheapest mobile with AT Commands
    By frank small in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: - 15th December 2004, 08:20
  5. pc communicate with pic16f877
    By meyou in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: - 5th August 2004, 23:26

Members who have read this thread : 0

You do not have permission to view the list of names.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts