IF..AND/OR..THEN and PBPL

[duncan303]

Thanks Skimask,

I did not think to check melabs for a patch

I downloaded the patch and the issue has gone away


I seem to always think that it is me that is doing something wrong, a confidence issue.

At least I am up to speed with that code now , so I am considering making some improvements whilst I know what is going on.

Maybe we should all be on an email mailing list at melabs for announcements and patches, after all everybody and thier father are trying to bombard me with stuff I do not want or have never heard of before. Why not things I should be kept up to date with?

Thanks again

duncan

[skimask]

Thanks Skimask,
I did not think to check melabs for a patch
I downloaded the patch and the issue has gone away
I seem to always think that it is me that is doing something wrong, a confidence issue.
At least I am up to speed with that code now , so I am considering making some improvements whilst I know what is going on.
Maybe we should all be on an email mailing list at melabs for announcements and patches, after all everybody and thier father are trying to bombard me with stuff I do not want or have never heard of before. Why not things I should be kept up to date with?
Thanks again
duncan

The patch fixes a few things...
The issue I was talking about is a bit different (deals with variables and constants inside the brackets, easy workaround, but still broken). I found a piece of paper here at work, under another pile at my desk with notes on it. The issue I found is a very small issue and I'd doubt highly somebody else will come across it and cause them a headache also.
Most patches and issues are posted here in one way or another, but, as I've found, I just go back to MeLabs site once in awhile just to see what's up. Works for me, and keeps down the overall email traffic

[duncan303]

Yes I accept that it would probably be better to keep the overall email traffic down.

I am not on PBP every day so it might be helpfull for somebody like me. I have to admit that I do tend to leave major upgrades either hardware or software for as long as possible to try a keep a longer period of stability to work in. Therefore I should check regularily for patches.

As to the syntax........ well spotted. I just checked the new and old manuals to see where I have got it into my head to use ( ) in defining an array. It is certainly not there. I seem to have used it like that for years, obviously a bad habit......... but not any more

Duncan

[skimask]

As to the syntax........ well spotted. I just checked the new and old manuals to see where I have got it into my head to use ( ) in defining an array. It is certainly not there. I seem to have used it like that for years, obviously a bad habit......... but not any more
Duncan

QBASIC?
GW-BASIC?