When used with FOR NEXT or any of the others, this should further cut time and code space .....Code:IF (ml_value[temp]-$5B)<$27 THEN Summe_alarm.0[temp]=0 ELSE summe_alarm.0[temp]=1 ENDIF
ASM anyone?
When used with FOR NEXT or any of the others, this should further cut time and code space .....Code:IF (ml_value[temp]-$5B)<$27 THEN Summe_alarm.0[temp]=0 ELSE summe_alarm.0[temp]=1 ENDIF
ASM anyone?
Paul Borgmeier
Salt Lake City, UT
USA
__________________
Worth to measure it... do we need to start a 'coding challenge' here... if so, i'll warn Darrel, he like that![]()
Steve
It's not a bug, it's a random feature.
There's no problem, only learning opportunities.
Last edited by paul borgmeier; - 28th May 2007 at 05:23. Reason: added more detail
Paul Borgmeier
Salt Lake City, UT
USA
__________________
Yes but first, we have to get rid of the .0[temp] for speed (see previous post).
i'm thinking of some kind of aliasing... but, i keep thinking...
Yeah, it's getting interesting![]()
Steve
It's not a bug, it's a random feature.
There's no problem, only learning opportunities.
Bookmarks