Wireless modules FCC approved


Closed Thread
Results 1 to 11 of 11

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Wellton, U.S.A.
    Posts
    5,924


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    I like the LINX products. Buy from Bruce.
    http://www.rentron.com/PicBasic/RemoteControl.htm

    Generally speaking, the lower the frequency the longer the range given the power is equal at the antenna.

    The higher freqs have the advantage of being able to pass through small openings. So it is harder to block the signal. Sometimes increasing the effective range over the lower freqs.

    As far as FCC goes, it is a good idea to read and maybe understand Part 15 of 47 CFR.

    Some frequencys are legal only at certain powers.

    Make sure you use an antenna that is matched to the frequency being used. Dave Houston has good info on his site. Worth a read.
    http://davehouston.net/
    Dave
    Always wear safety glasses while programming.

  2. #2


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Thanks.

    Some of these (I think) don't require an FCC lab test if put into a product though....I'm interested in something like that because ALL xmtrs (if sold as a product) require FCC approval, right?

    I'm not even sure my Xstream are like that.

    Just discovered the Xcite -- didn't know about them -- only 40 bucks.

    I know there are some modules out there that you can just put in a box that are already FCC approved.

    Can't remember where I saw them.

  3. #3


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Also -- If you had a choice, everything else being equal....

    In a typical modern office building with a lot of steel construction etc would you...

    2.4ghz at 50mw

    or

    900mhz at 100mw

    ?

    What's the general consensus on that?

    A real difference or 6 to 1?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,073


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    AFAIK, anything sold assembled and ready to use requires FCC testing. The testing is expensive which (in part) explains the high cost of pre-approved modules. Even receivers require testing - it's not only transmitters. You really need to read the Part 15 documentation.Her's a link with some data on indoor propagation.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Look, behind you.
    Posts
    2,818


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Higher the Frequency, the more line of sight the signal becomes, lower the power the shorter the range, that said the higher Frequency units might be a little less affected by noise.
    If you do not believe in MAGIC, Consider how currency has value simply by printing it, and is then traded for real assets.
    .
    Gold is the money of kings, silver is the money of gentlemen, barter is the money of peasants - but debt is the money of slaves
    .
    There simply is no "Happy Spam" If you do it you will disappear from this forum.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    2,405


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Even if you toss a pre-certified module into your product, it will most likely still need FCC
    cert before you can sell it. Contact one of the certified test labs if you aren't 100% sure.

    These guys are one of the best http://www.celectronics.com/

    The finished product (even if it uses a pre-certified module), may still need final certification
    of the finished product before you can legally sell it.

    An FCC certified test facility will tell you straight-up if your product needs further FCC cert.

    They will tell you without charging you for the info, and it's worth the effort.
    Regards,

    -Bruce
    tech at rentron.com
    http://www.rentron.com

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    96


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    I have looked into FCC testing myself, only 3-5k if you've got spare change.
    Linx Technologies has got some great material on the subject.

    After looking through LINX technologies website and making my list of (should have learned this in college EE Communications) questions I called LINX to ask the same kinds of questions you have been asking. Everything posted so far sounds in line with what I was told my the antenna factory/ linx rf modules guys.

    One thing to consider is what kind of data are you sending?

    Continuous? Intermittent?

    900Mhz alows for continuous data but 433-434 Mhz does not. If you are just using rf modules for hobby work or you don't care about FCC rules (you obviously do) you can just send continuous data in a loop at lower freq with lower cost modules from Linx.

    Also most of the rf modules require line of sight applications to get the full range advertised by the companies making them.

    I admit that I have limited knowledge as I have only been designing with rf for a few years now. So far I have used the LINX KH2-xxx-xx & LR-xxx-xx modules both at 433Mhz. I was cheap and did not buy the prebuilt development boards. So to save my time/money/heartache from a wasted prototype.... I called LINX with LOTS of questions about laying out my ground planes, rp coax connections, etc before having my PCB's made. Taking my time and calling their tech support was worth it. I

    totally recommend reading all you can from their FCC dowloads, rf for tech challenged, antenna theory manuals and give em a call. The last guy I spoke with (at linx) was an rf communications vet of 25 years in IRAN, IRAQ, CANADA with military and non military rf design experience. They know their stuff! Hope this helps!
    Padawan-78

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    96


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Talking

    Just thought I would throw in a plug for Bruce @ Rentron,
    I bought my first RF modules in college (4 years ago) from their website and I was very impressed with the service I recieved and variety of low cost rf parts/ examples they offered.
    Great job guys!
    Padawan-78

Similar Threads

  1. Low latency Wireless RF transceiver modules?
    By mark155 in forum General
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: - 4th March 2010, 05:20
  2. Software RS232 and wireless modules
    By Michael in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: - 17th August 2008, 05:27
  3. CM02 and RF04 wireless modules problem
    By vladimir059@hot in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: - 14th December 2006, 10:32
  4. supply FSK COB modules and FSK modules
    By Elsa zhang in forum Adverts
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: - 8th August 2006, 06:40
  5. Wireless comms with Linx LR modules
    By telemark in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: - 2nd July 2006, 01:58

Members who have read this thread : 0

You do not have permission to view the list of names.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts