What you said could make sense if the 2nd version actually was taking longer, but it's running 8 times faster.
remember, pause 2000 is measuring out as 2000ms but the loop example is completing in 258ms!
|
What you said could make sense if the 2nd version actually was taking longer, but it's running 8 times faster.
remember, pause 2000 is measuring out as 2000ms but the loop example is completing in 258ms!
Members who have read this thread : 0You do not have permission to view the list of names.
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks