Using an Assmbly Routine in PBP

Results 1 to 8 of 8

Threaded View

  1. - 5th September 2008, 00:25 #7
    leisryan's Avatar
    leisryan
    leisryan is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    41

    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Smile

    Quote Originally Posted by Darrel Taylor View Post
    They're really two completely different things.
    But if I had to choose one, I'd say "Indirect Addressing".

    Access Ram is more for optimizing the code, reducing the size by letting you do things with less bank switching. It doesn't really give any additional functionality.

    But "Indirect Addressing" let's you use the entire RAM space like it's a big array, which adds just a TON of functionality. Strings, packets, buffers, software stacks, etc. etc.
    <br>
    Wow!!! I really appreciate it really enlightening!!! Is bank switching still occurs in "Indirect Addressing" Un-noticeably though?
    Last edited by leisryan; - 5th September 2008 at 00:29.
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Similar Threads

  1. PBP Book
    By Bruce in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 83
    Last Post: - 4th October 2021, 12:55
  2. PBP, ASM and LST files
    By HenrikOlsson in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: - 12th January 2010, 13:43
  3. Compiler differences between PBP 2.33 & 2.46
    By nikopolis in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: - 2nd May 2006, 19:01
  4. Newby- PBP wont compile for 18F (MPLAB)
    By jd76duke in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: - 17th December 2005, 23:30
  5. Accessing a PBP array from inside an assembly language routine.
    By cupajoe in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: - 8th August 2004, 16:00

Members who have read this thread : 0

You do not have permission to view the list of names.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Forum Rules