Measuring Volts and Amps digitally

[skimask]

The frequency is 50Hz (UK AC) but because its DC ripple i guess that makes it 100Hz......................
To make it even worse the pic chip will have to deal with 8 ADC pins. It might be an idea to split the work between multiple PICs

If you run that 100hz DC ripple across a capacitor with a very small value bleed resistor, said capacitor will quickly charge up to the peak value of that ripple, thereby negating your need to quickly sample the output, maybe even isolate it with a diode so it (the cap) can't bleed back into your supply. Basically, you end up with a full wave filter without much of a load.

[The Master]

I thought about that but decided not to because i was unsure about it leaking back into the output. If a simple diode takes care of it then i guess the rectifier would do the same thing.

I worked out that witout a capacitor or anything that the PIC could get up to 0.38V less than what it should do. That equates to about 78 levels difference out of 1024 or a 7.6171875% error. All that is based on my maths being correct but 7.6% sounds about right.

I just had an idea. dhouston mentioned zero-crossing. I already know how to detect that thanks to the PWM circuits ive made before. What i could do is wait for a zero crossing then wait a certain amount of time then run a few samples. That should put all the samples closer to the peak.

The capacitor idea sounds really simple though. If the capacitor can keep the level high enough between peaks then in theory i could sample each one once every second. I would like a single chip to sample all 8 if possible and send the data to the PC through serial so i think i do really need the capacitor.

What is the purpose of a "bleed" resistor? Is that to go in series or parallel with the capacitor? I would need the capacitor to empty pretty quick but not as quick as the frequency of the input. I dont want to have to wait 10 mins while it realises the output isnt drawing as much current anymore.

Edit: I plan to buy an oscilloscope with these components so it will be easier to test and see the sinewave

[skimask]

If a simple diode takes care of it then i guess the rectifier would do the same thing.

Pretty much does, but you have to calculate the offset caused by the diode's forward voltage drop (either ~.25v or ~.6v depending on the type)

What is the purpose of a "bleed" resistor? Is that to go in series or parallel with the capacitor?

Series to ground, parallel across itself, whatever, you'll have to figure that out yourself (think R/C time constant). The bleed resistor will let the cap falls off if/when the input voltage average drops. I think you've got the idea, just need to plug some numbers into a couple formulas.

[The Master]

I think the diode part can be compensated by calibrating the circuit. Im going to have a variable resistor that can move the output in the range of 3-7V, then i will use the computer calibrating part (either the chip of a furmula on the final result) as a kind of fine tuning.

Just thinking about calibration. Whats the best way? I was thinking to connect up my multimeter, apply different loads and match the output to the multimeters output. Would that work well enough?

How do you choose a capacitor and bleed resistor? I know you sort of told me but im not sure. Which do you pick first? The capacitor or the resistor?