MicroCode Studio VS Mplab

[tonyfelloni]

Basically, which it better?

I currently use Microcode and find it ok but would like the opinion of someone more experienced so that I dont have to chop and change later down the road (we are creatures of habit after all!)

This microcontroller\programming lark is a mine field at the start!

Tony

[skimask]

I currently use Microcode and find it ok but would like the opinion of someone more experienced so that I dont have to chop and change later down the road (we are creatures of habit after all!)
This microcontroller\programming lark is a mine field at the start!

MCS is good...very good. 'Connects' to PBP, starts/runs the compiler, assembler, handles files, highlights PBP keywords and/or errors...and so on and so on...

MPLAB is also good. But it's more like a souped up version of Notepad when compared to MCS.

I wouldn't worry about it. Go with MCS for now. If MCS ever falls out of favor, it wouldn't take hardly any 'relearning' to go with something else since MCS uses practically all of the usual Windows commands (Ctrl-C = copy, Ctrl-V = paste, and so on).

And it works in Linux under Wine

[tenaja]

You understand those are two different IDE's, right? One was designed for PBP Basic, and the other for assembly. I would suggest using the IDE which matches the language you write in.

FWIW, I do have MCS+, and it's a worthwhile upgrade.

[skimask]

You understand those are two different IDE's, right? One was designed for PBP Basic, and the other for assembly. I would suggest using the IDE which matches the language you write in.

That's why I saw MPLAB is more like a souped up version of Notepad. It's not PBP 'specific' and isn't much more useful than Notepad.
MPLAB - 0
MCS - 2

[mackrackit]

If the OP is talking about MCS+ them I would agree, maybe, that MCS+ is the way to go.
If it is about a comparison between MCS that is shipped with PBP and MPLAB then MPLAB win.

MPLAB works very well with PBP, does all the highlighting of code and such. It also has the features of MCS+ , reads registers, EEPROM, config bits, disassembly listing, and maybe more.

MPLAB works under wine on a Linux box also.

I have to admit, I do not have MCS+, I am going by what is on the web site for it. I will not be upgrading to it as long as MPLAB does what it does and continues to be FREE. Yes I am cheap.

The people that make PBP has provided a way to make their product work with MPLAB, so I figure that is good enough. You still need MPASM for a lot of things. (part of MPLAB)

So why go with a third party program.

MPLAB is designed to work with PICs. The language it uses is selectable.

Thats my 2.5 cents worth.

[Bruce]

In my opinion, MPLAB wins hands-down.

[tonyfelloni]

lol, see what I mean about it being a mine field for beginners... so many options and so many viewpoints.

It all helps though!

I'm currently trashing out the details of my final college project next year. It's basically a souped up incubator for reptiles (Kinda like pimp my incubator!) I want it to have an interface to the web so that i could go to a web address and this page would be updated with variables like the temp, humidity and possibly a still image updated once a day.

Any ideas if this side of things would be difficult to achieve? I have tonnes of time to do some research I just need to know where to start! I need to achieve all this with mostly self constructed circuits rather than pre-build modules.

Tony