no miracle at sight
Hi, Jerson
as MPASM needs to be told which processor it must compile for ... before launching PbP ( or MPASM ... ), I do not see how to do that .
I already tried that with pure asm ... LOL :
some similar processors can compile the same file without pain ... and conditionnal assembly solve the header files choice and different registers and ports naming.
I just placed an error message shown by MPASM at compile time to verify if processor selected was the good one ...
Now, with PbP ... I haven't tried conditionnal assembly yet ( possible ? - inserting asm directives ? ) and Already asked Steve, if he saw a solution to tell MPLAB which processor I want to use.
Answer was the same as yours ... you must tell MPLAB which processor in use AT FIRST.
Alain
PS ... MPLAB 8.10 release is launched ... but still no PBPL integration !!! GRRRRRRRR !!!
************************************************** ***********************
Why insist on using 32 Bits when you're not even able to deal with the first 8 ones ??? ehhhhhh ...
************************************************** ***********************
IF there is the word "Problem" in your question ...
certainly the answer is " RTFM " or " RTFDataSheet " !!!
*****************************************
Bookmarks