Which resonator is best


Closed Thread
Results 1 to 34 of 34

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    montreal, canada
    Posts
    6,898


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by My submited ticket
    Area: PICmicro Products
    Product Group:
    Product: Date Created: 4/2/2008 6:48 PM
    Issue: Reliability Specification Date Resolved: 4/10/2008 5:30 AM
    Description: Hi,
    i've a small question for you. Is there any kind of relationship between the OSC speed and the PICMicro lifetime?

    Will a PIC running, say @20Mhz, have shorter lifetime than another running@4Mhz assuming they both running the same program, same voltage, ambient temperature etc etc.

    Just curious to know.

    Thanks for any doc and/or tips.
    This is what Microchip told me

    Quote Originally Posted by Reply of Microchip
    Resolution: Hi Steve,

    There is no relation between the OSC speed and the PICMicro lifetime.

    The device gets into shorter life span conditions only if operated higher (over and above) the absolute electrical conditions as specified by the specific device datasheet.

    Hope the information helps you. In case you need further assistance please let us know.

    Thanks and Regards,
    Steve

    It's not a bug, it's a random feature.
    There's no problem, only learning opportunities.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Wellton, U.S.A.
    Posts
    5,924


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Well that clears that up!
    Dave
    Always wear safety glasses while programming.

  3. #3
    skimask's Avatar
    skimask Guest


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    I agree completely with the Microchip reply...
    However, doesn't it looks too much like a 'canned statement'?
    I wouldn't doubt that, all other things being equal, a PIC running at 20Mhz would fail sooner than that exact same PIC running at 4Mhz.
    But how much sooner? What kind of time scale are we talking about here? Would any of us, or our offspring be around to mark the time at which one or the other failed? Kind of like measuring how long an EEPROM will hold data. EEPROMs haven't been around for the 100's of years it would take for one to supposedly degrade and lose data.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Mansfield, UK
    Posts
    697


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    For the things im making at the moment i have no need for them to continue working longer than i do. If i will not live to see my devices fail with either osc then it doesnt bother me which i use.

    I would have thought that a higher speed would shorten the lifespan but i think it depends on what actually fails. If the inner workings of the chip will only last for a certain amount of switching (like some relays can only switch 100,000 before they are due to break) then it would shorten the lifespan (twice as many switches, half the length of time).

    That reply suggests that the lifetime doesnt have anything to do with that and it may be something else. Maybe something inside degrades over time?

    Just my thoughts anyway

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    INDIA
    Posts
    89


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    I always use MAX7375AXR805+ , Where xtal failed and serial data disrupt at 80 degr.C.

    Great performance. Try it with two free sample order.


    .

Members who have read this thread : 0

You do not have permission to view the list of names.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts