18FXXX = better code efficiency?

Closed Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Hybrid View

  1. - 2nd November 2004, 21:49 #1
    mister_e's Avatar
    mister_e
    mister_e is offline Contributor
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    montreal, canada
    Posts
    6,898

    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    After testing it with a program under 16f648 to migrate to 18f2525... really disapointed about.... twice the code space.

    It looks PBP doesn't really care about the 16bit instruction set. But there's maybe an setting to do before compile it... Maybe Melanie know how.

    regards
    Last edited by mister_e; - 2nd November 2004 at 22:10.
    Steve

    It's not a bug, it's a random feature.
    There's no problem, only learning opportunities.
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Similar Threads

  1. Thermo 7 segments - little problem
    By fratello in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 49
    Last Post: - 27th July 2013, 07:31
  2. Single digit 7 Seg LED clock - PIC16F88
    By thirsty in forum Code Examples
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: - 17th July 2009, 08:42
  3. Help with sound command in 2 programs
    By hyperboarder in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: - 5th July 2007, 20:36
  4. Serout problem
    By lerameur in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 94
    Last Post: - 25th February 2007, 13:33
  5. ds1307 from f877 to f452 not work
    By microkam in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: - 7th July 2005, 00:02

Members who have read this thread : 0

You do not have permission to view the list of names.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Forum Rules