18FXXX = better code efficiency?

Results 1 to 6 of 6

Threaded View

  1. - 2nd November 2004, 21:16 #2
    mister_e's Avatar
    mister_e
    mister_e is offline Contributor
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    montreal, canada
    Posts
    6,898

    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Hi Jim,
    I don't know if it's mean something but i'm really disapointed about the test i just do. I compile a program use on a 16F877 wich was using 388 word of code space to a 18F452.... now using 722 Bytes of code space.

    My assumption, since 18Fserie are 8bits instead of 14bit (16f877) is that PBP will still use 14bits core limited instruction. In that situation, i think ther's many improvement to do by Melabs.

    i'll send e-mail to melabs and see what they do with this.

    regards
    Last edited by mister_e; - 2nd November 2004 at 21:29.
    Steve

    It's not a bug, it's a random feature.
    There's no problem, only learning opportunities.
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Similar Threads

  1. Thermo 7 segments - little problem
    By fratello in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 49
    Last Post: - 27th July 2013, 07:31
  2. Single digit 7 Seg LED clock - PIC16F88
    By thirsty in forum Code Examples
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: - 17th July 2009, 08:42
  3. Help with sound command in 2 programs
    By hyperboarder in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: - 5th July 2007, 20:36
  4. Serout problem
    By lerameur in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 94
    Last Post: - 25th February 2007, 13:33
  5. ds1307 from f877 to f452 not work
    By microkam in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: - 7th July 2005, 00:02

Members who have read this thread : 0

You do not have permission to view the list of names.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Forum Rules