If I was allowed to use pronouns, emotive & colloquial language, that essay would have read a whole lot differently.Originally Posted by tenaja
|
If I was allowed to use pronouns, emotive & colloquial language, that essay would have read a whole lot differently.
|
Capital punishment only works if the punishment occurs in a timely manner, given the prison environment especially for pedophiles I believe capital punishment to be a less severe sentence than life.
If you do not believe in MAGIC, Consider how currency has value simply by printing it, and is then traded for real assets.
.
Gold is the money of kings, silver is the money of gentlemen, barter is the money of peasants - but debt is the money of slaves
.
There simply is no "Happy Spam" If you do it you will disappear from this forum.
|
I initially made a claim like that in the first one I did (the unit consisted of 3 assignments) Unfortunately I couldn't find anything to reference it to, so I lost some marks. I made an insinuation that capital punishment can be the most dignifying thing for some people, because can you imagine how a rapist or pedophile would spend their time in jail? This was of course an attempt to defend the far-flung claim that capital punishment is barbaric. Kinda like putting a sick animal out of their misery I guess.
|
I had to have my German Shepard put down, due to advanced Gastric cancer, A shot of pain killer and the potassium chloride, he was gone before he knew it, lights out. Seems like a pretty good way to go. I would sure prefer it to prison.
If you do not believe in MAGIC, Consider how currency has value simply by printing it, and is then traded for real assets.
.
Gold is the money of kings, silver is the money of gentlemen, barter is the money of peasants - but debt is the money of slaves
.
There simply is no "Happy Spam" If you do it you will disappear from this forum.
|
What does the phrase "Guilty beyond a reasonable doubt" mean to you?
|
That's an easy one.
1. Eye Witness(s)
2. DNA
3. Motive
4. Possession of victim's belongings
5. The accused's belongings at the scene
Give me 3 or more of those and I'll give you a guilty verdict.
But in a rape case I'd probably return a guilty verdict from just DNA alone and a believable testimony from the victim.
Last edited by T.Jackson; - 19th March 2008 at 08:45.
|
Man accused of killing his wife.
1. Eye Witness(s) = No.
2. DNA = Yes, this is his home.
3. Motive = Not known.
4. Possession of victim's belongings = Yes, this was her home.
5. The accused's belongings at the scene = Yes, this is his home.
Members who have read this thread : 0You do not have permission to view the list of names.
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks