Does CLEAR Command clear return adrress of a subroutine?

[skimask]

Ok, here is a simple example good enough to explain the issue.
...........

If you're careful, and I mean very, very careful, you could turn off the Stack Overflow/Underflow reset bits in the CONFIG and just not worry about the RETURN addresses...let them overflow as they will.
But again, you'd have to be very careful, especially if you nest any GOSUB's at all...so that might not work out at all.
Maybe take DT's Software Gosub example shown earlier and add your own subroutine to POP the last GOSUB address off the Software Stack.

Actually, I just looked at the code for the first time...
In the swStack.inc file, you could use this section:

'------------Pop Address from the Stack---------------------------------------
Pop:
    if StackPTR = 0 then  StackEmpty = 1  ; Update Empty status
    if StackEmpty = 0 then                ; If Stack isn't Empty
       Address = Stack[StackPTR-1]        ; Get last Address from the Stack
       StackPTR = StackPTR - 1            ; Point to Prior Stack level
       StackFull = 0                      ; 0 - Since we just removed 1
    else
       STunderflow = 1                    ; Stack was Empty on swReturn
    endif
    if StackPTR = 0 then  StackEmpty = 1  ; Update Empty status
return

You have access to the Pop subroutine.

But I'm guessing here...since I haven't used to swGosub/swReturn routines at all.........

You 'include' DT's software stack routines, your code above becomes:

Begin:
OK = 0
MainMenu:
'...stuff is going on here...
    IF OK = 1 THEN
               @ swGOSUB PrintMemory
    ENDIF
    GOTO MainMenu
PrintMemory:
    IF Memory = 0 THEN
               Gosub Pop  'regular Gosub here, generic, can be used system wide
               Goto BEGIN    'no more return address from the Gosub above
    ENDIF
    swRETURN

Again, I'm guessing...