Servo not reaching full travel


Closed Thread
Results 1 to 40 of 40

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    skimask's Avatar
    skimask Guest


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ruijc View Post
    Hi skimask,
    i'm using a 16F628A.
    With your new code the servo moves all the way up to the new red marks ( as showned in pic # 2 ).
    It is still not at it's fisical limit but i think that probably these are the electronic limits of the servo.
    .
    Could be the electronic limit thing saving the servo and the gears themselves. Maybe get your hands on an older analog type (i.e. S148) and see what happens.

    Also, you said that your center isn't quite right. Could be because you're using the internal oscillator and it's not quite on spec. Datasheet says you could have up to about 5% slop on that (Table 17-5).

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    NW France
    Posts
    3,653


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Talking Rtfds !!!

    Hi,

    Just remember this is a DIGITAL Servo, and digital servos have "software" programmed travel limits ...

    from the Datasheet ...

    << This digital servo cannot be used with the following * AM *
    transmitters as the servo neutral signal is: 1310us).
    CONQUEST AM, FG Series (T4FG, T5FGK,T6FG, T6FGK, T7FGK), New Terratop,
    T3EGX, T3PGE, T2NL, T2LGX, T2FR, T2PK series.

    ***** Do not use digital servos with older AM systems *****
    >>

    Some brands, like hitec, sell the programming box to trim your own parameters ( travel, speed ... etc.)

    They also can recognize a valid signal frame ...

    so, shortly said, they do not allow you to make "uncontrolled things" ...

    Once more reading the servo DATASHEET could have helped !!! ...

    Alain
    Last edited by Acetronics2; - 29th December 2007 at 11:32.
    ************************************************** ***********************
    Why insist on using 32 Bits when you're not even able to deal with the first 8 ones ??? ehhhhhh ...
    ************************************************** ***********************
    IF there is the word "Problem" in your question ...
    certainly the answer is " RTFM " or " RTFDataSheet " !!!
    *****************************************

  3. #3


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Acetronics,

    true about that...

    BUT

    If it wasnt for skimask i woudnt be able to get that extra travel


    PS. - do you have the link for the s3152 datasheet ?
    .

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    montreal, canada
    Posts
    6,898


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Steve

    It's not a bug, it's a random feature.
    There's no problem, only learning opportunities.

  5. #5


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Thanks mister_e,

    " the neutral is at 1310ms " ... weird

    .

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    NW France
    Posts
    3,653


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ruijc View Post
    Thanks mister_e,

    " the neutral is at 1310ms " ... weird

    .

    Nooooooooooooo,

    Those OLD systems HAD a 1310 µs neutral ... from Robbe ( German brand ); Lextronic ( French brand ) and Multiplex had a 1.65 ms neutral, KRAFT ( US ) had a 1.70 or 1.80 ms neutral ...

    Now, it's 1500µs for Everyone !!!

    Alain
    Last edited by Acetronics2; - 29th December 2007 at 14:21.
    ************************************************** ***********************
    Why insist on using 32 Bits when you're not even able to deal with the first 8 ones ??? ehhhhhh ...
    ************************************************** ***********************
    IF there is the word "Problem" in your question ...
    certainly the answer is " RTFM " or " RTFDataSheet " !!!
    *****************************************

  7. #7
    skimask's Avatar
    skimask Guest


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Thanks Alain...a lot of good info I wasn't even aware existed...
    I would've figure since these were servos in fast moving vehicles that they would've been a bit 'tighter' from day 1, with all the damage they could possibly inflict.
    More info to stuff in the head for future use...

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    NW France
    Posts
    3,653


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Angry

    Hi, Ruijc

    Having tortured ( also build and modified ...) dozens of servos ...

    I can tell you EVEN Analog ones do not meet your requirements , as the linear response of futaba analog servos is only about 1/2 of the physical range ...

    for the full mechanical travel of a S3001, I've measured the pulse width from 200 µs ( full left ) to 2500µs ( full right ) with an awful ( LOL ) non-linearity between 200 and 800 µs ...

    Now ... Digital. " a 1.3 ms neutral won't work... " ... as classical travel is +/- 0.5 ms
    that means roughly only .9 to 2.1ms range will be accepted by the digital "amplifier" ... or will give a proportionnal output.


    STOP DREAMING this servo will NEVER REACH ITS PHYSICAL LIMITS !!! otherwise, that would mean you can burn the output stage of the amp ...


    Skimask's lines permit you to measure the input range of your servo ... cause exploring from 100 to 2900 µS.
    You're then sure you've seen ALL the travel your servo gan give ... no need to try to get more, unless modifying the servo amp factory settings !!!

    Alain
    Last edited by Acetronics2; - 29th December 2007 at 14:18.
    ************************************************** ***********************
    Why insist on using 32 Bits when you're not even able to deal with the first 8 ones ??? ehhhhhh ...
    ************************************************** ***********************
    IF there is the word "Problem" in your question ...
    certainly the answer is " RTFM " or " RTFDataSheet " !!!
    *****************************************

Similar Threads

  1. More Servo Woes
    By chrisshortys in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: - 13th May 2009, 09:40
  2. Problem with 12F629, servo and EEPROM
    By Atom058 in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: - 1st March 2008, 10:53
  3. Servo does not move
    By ruijc in forum General
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: - 12th November 2007, 20:14
  4. Beginner + Servo
    By james in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: - 31st July 2007, 22:31
  5. Help with Servo Control Please!
    By wireman22 in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: - 7th June 2007, 19:15

Members who have read this thread : 0

You do not have permission to view the list of names.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts