It's not a test on intelligence. You need to be completely honest with your answers, otherwise it would be void.
It's not a test on intelligence. You need to be completely honest with your answers, otherwise it would be void.
Apparently, it also needs interpretation.
Getting a higher score than someone else doesn't mean anything.
I guess it's a good thing they also SELL books and software that tell you how to use the results.
Now who's going to buy that to interpret this thread?
And if not, why are we taking the test?
(oh yeah, the low numbers again) doh!
_
DT
Kinda like the supposed psychology of the Luscher Colour Test, done by a guy of dubious repute who made a very good living peddling ambiguities based on somebody elses ideas... and as with anything 'open to interpretation' (from Horroscopes to Religious texts) it can be anything you want it to be...
This thing may work and it may not. Every one does learn different things differently.
If one is taking the role of teacher, then one will have to understand how the student learns.
If a test like this could be set up for people under 12 years of age, and again if it is valid, it would be an invaluable tool.
Dave
Always wear safety glasses while programming.
It's recognized & used by Curtin University in Australia. Still have doubts?
Bookmarks