I normally have the ability to at least come up with some sort of opinion with most things (often it's wrong), but on that, I can't even think of one guess, not even an obviously far-fetched one.
|
I normally have the ability to at least come up with some sort of opinion with most things (often it's wrong), but on that, I can't even think of one guess, not even an obviously far-fetched one.
|
Going back to the early days of PBP, before Microcode studio, to the days when you carved your code into slate tablets, there was an anomaly/bug with PBP sometimes handling math within array parenthesis. The workaround was to simply add a dummy argument (which goes to show how old that code is). Now I can't remember at which point the error was eradicated without compiling a bunch of test samples across more than half-a-dozen versions of PBP. The code I posted above pretty much works with all versions, though if absolute speed is your thing, you can probably lose the +0 if your PBP is relatively up-to-date.
|
Oh! - well that puts my mind at ease, it's things like that keep me from getting a good nights sleep. I'll be able to switch off tonight and get some rest.
Members who have read this thread : 3You do not have permission to view the list of names.
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks