Power usage 'generally' goes up as the square of the operating speed...
i.e. 1mA @ 4Mhz, 4mA @ 8Mhz, 16mA @ 16Mhz, etc.etc...not always true, but generally.
If you've got the board designed and have it set up for an 'F59, then switch over to an 18F4620 (or even a 16F877). A bit more spendy, but loads more options, it'll plop right into the same socket with very few (if any) hardware changes, less current draw both in operation and standy with more options to run the clock, including clock switching in the middle of operation, and most importantly...interrupts that can wake up your PIC ONLY when a switch is tripped (see Interrupt on Pin Change in the datasheets for the above mentioned PICs), thereby meaning your PIC would be asleep EXCEPT when triggered by a door...which could mean that practically 99.9999999999% of the time, your PIC is sleeping. And I'd be willing to bet that the difference in price would more than make up for the new-found flexibility of the newer chips.The reason I'm useing this chip, well I dont need any options other than a voltage detector to determine when the power drops to 4.5v and I was using a voltage detector with a trigger at 4.5v. the chip I'm using cost $1.38 (the cheapest I found with 33 ios) here in mexico through newark. Do you know of other pics cheaper that are Flash ? I'm open to suggestions But I do preaty much have my board desgned.
Bookmarks