DIY KITs - Survey


Closed Thread
Results 1 to 28 of 28

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    T.Jackson's Avatar
    T.Jackson Guest


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Post Not a good idea

    Hi Adam,

    Jaycar Electronics actual own the copyright to that project. Certain they would pursue legal action if an inferior (copied / similar) product became available. Some may argue that a similar product with some unique character would fall under the Creative Comms act. http://creativecommons.org/

    I don't recommend doing a project like this and trying to sell it. The director of Jaycar is a very rich, powerful & highly persuasive man (From what I've heard). Not a good idea bud.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    126


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    How about a PIC controlled binary clock?. Something that is a fun project, but also useful to learn binary? (Although most of them are actually BCD rather than true binary).

    Good for beginners and nerdy enough for people like me !!!

    Bill.

  3. #3
    T.Jackson's Avatar
    T.Jackson Guest


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bcd View Post
    How about a PIC controlled binary clock?. Something that is a fun project, but also useful to learn binary? (Although most of them are actually BCD rather than true binary).

    Good for beginners and nerdy enough for people like me !!!

    Bill.
    Yeah - that could possibly be something interesting and even legal too. BCD - Binary Coded Decimal is as such binary. BCD is the binary equivalent of a decimal value. Binary is a base 2 number system wit LSB to the right and MSB to the left. 128 64 32 16 8 4 2 1 - these are the actual decimal weights of the bits. When a bit is set, in BCD, it's weight is added together with other set bits and their weights to form BCD.
    Last edited by T.Jackson; - 14th May 2007 at 22:24.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    432


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by T.Jackson View Post
    Hi Adam,

    Jaycar Electronics actual own the copyright to that project. Certain they would pursue legal action if an inferior (copied / similar) product became available. Some may argue that a similar product with some unique character would fall under the Creative Comms act. http://creativecommons.org/

    I don't recommend doing a project like this and trying to sell it. The director of Jaycar is a very rich, powerful & highly persuasive man (From what I've heard). Not a good idea bud.
    There are already similar products in existance. The Broadcast Industry has used similar looking LED clocks for many years such as this one sold by Canford Audio

    http://www.canford.co.uk/commerce/pr...oductid=58-782

    The Broadcast clocks are generally slaved from a master time controller to ensure all displays are exactly the same but the general look of the Jaycar project isnt significantly different to those existing commercial products.

    Reading the description of how the Jaycar kit animates the process of illuminating the next second LED would appear to be about the only unique aspect of their design.

    Please note that I am not advocating that anyone should rip off someone elses design but pointing out the similar products can be developed by different people in different locations at the same time.

    For many years TV stations have used graphics of clock with seconds appearing as the minute progresses.

    Several years ago, Maplin published a design for an MSF controlled digital clock using a PIC and BiColour LED displays. If the MSF radio signal was absent the clock would keep time by its own crystal reference but the display would be red to indicate that it may not be totally accurate. When displaying the time received from the MSF radio signal the display was green.
    Keith

    www.diyha.co.uk
    www.kat5.tv

  5. #5
    T.Jackson's Avatar
    T.Jackson Guest


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Yeah - still relatively hesitant to do it unless it had many unique features and looked miles apart. The Jaycar clock wacher's KIT is the only commercial KIT of its kind to my knowledge. All told, I"m lead to believe that it's actually not that popular. Not a failure but possibly not doing as well as expected. This is the impression that I get from Jaycar sales staff.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Omaha, Nebraska USA
    Posts
    263


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Oh, wow--wish I'd seen this thread sooner!

    I tried doing True/False on the questions and couldn't; my answers aren't that simple. Like BobK, I've been in this a long, long time (he's got about 4 years on me). My first kit was a shortwave receiver, a Hallicrafters S-119K "Sky Buddy II" in 1963. (I still have it.) Lots of kits in those days--Heath and Knight were the big ones I remember. My first ham transmitter was a Heathkit DX-35.

    I think a nifty (look that up, too!) product line to hit the kit market is the Elecraft stuff (http://www.elecraft.com/). High-end, but very nice.

    Like Melanie, I do this stuff for a living, but I still putter around breadboarding stuff and buying the occasional kit. Unlike Melanie, I wouldn't classify the Heath line as "crap kits". They offered a balanced line, from the simple to the elaborate. There were a few duds, to be sure. But (for example) the Heathkit "Twoer" (one of two products--the other was the "Sixer"--generically called "lunchboxes" because of the handle on top) did more to put hams on 144 MHz (2 meters) than any other single product in history--and it did so without busting your wallet.

    I think there's always a market for good, well-designed kits. I believe Velleman has demonstrated that, as has Ramsey (http://www.ramseyelectronics.com/hk/). Last year, I redesigned a product as a kit (http://www.i-zombie.com/pages/sc1201...controller.php). The biggest challenge was doing a decent instruction manual--it was unbelievably time-consuming!

    Trent, it sounds like you're doing some market research. How about telling us more?
    Last edited by RussMartin; - 14th July 2007 at 00:51.
    Russ
    N0EVC, xWB6ONT, xWN6ONT

    "Easy to use" is easy to say.

  7. #7
    T.Jackson's Avatar
    T.Jackson Guest


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Post Market Research

    Secretly, unbeknown to a lot of us, I think there's quite a few silent contenders on here doing exactly just that - market research. Conclusion with what I've seen so far; most people are extremely creative, each thriving on radical new wisdom of their very own. Any KIT that does much less than allows them to fuel this new insight would be a hard sell. Artistic drawing programs would be a good sell around here. I'm just as gifted, believe me when I say that I know what I'm talking about.

  8. #8
    T.Jackson's Avatar
    T.Jackson Guest


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Also, another observation - a graphical flowchart-based version of PBP would sell like a hotcake!

Similar Threads

  1. Current DIY or budget USB type programmers
    By mr.sneezy in forum General
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: - 14th November 2008, 16:59
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: - 28th February 2008, 12:45
  3. DIY Laser Tag System (PBPRO-based)
    By thelightbrain in forum Adverts
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: - 18th March 2006, 04:45
  4. DIY Serial LCD
    By lwindridge in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: - 10th January 2005, 10:41

Members who have read this thread : 0

You do not have permission to view the list of names.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts