I know that it is working and that it doesn't really matter but I want to check my oscilloscope readings correspond with the correct convention.
Well, this is sure a strange question. I would think you would know why you are using it, since you have it in your code. I think the link rhino provided is good. But if you absolutley must know and have no clue why it is in your code, I would look at http://www.ottawarobotics.org/articles/rf/rf.html.I would like to know the technical reason why I am using manchester coding and $55 as the preamble.
Another strange one, how about using MPLAB (or the simulator of your choice) and see how the code runs. Then, compare this to what you see in the oscilloscope and see what happens. They should match, and you should be able to tell how the bits are done and how the code treats them.I know that it is working and that it doesn't really matter but I want to check my oscilloscope readings correspond with the correct convention.
I agree with skimask, I do not think it matters (as long as it is the same in both TX and RX).
Have you read any of the above replies?
Have you visited the links?
If you did and did not understood anything, come back to ask. The link http://www.ottawarobotics.org/articles/rf/rf.html at the 2.1 MANCHESTER ENCODING - The art of balancing a serial stream discusses a lot...
Ioannis
Have you read any of the above replies?
Have you visited the links?
If you did and did not understood anything, come back to ask. The link http://www.ottawarobotics.org/articles/rf/rf.html at the 2.1 MANCHESTER ENCODING - The art of balancing a serial stream discusses a lot...
Ioannis
Bookmarks