Short distance Light beam control (10cm) - what is best to use in On/Off mode?


Closed Thread
Results 1 to 15 of 15

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    SWITZERLAND (french speaking)
    Posts
    938

    Default Short distance Light beam control (10cm) - what is best to use in On/Off mode?

    Hello,

    I have to make a kind of keyboard where the buttons are replaced by seven small light beam control (barrières lumineuses - Lichtschranke) having to check a distance of 10 centimeters (is the beam interrupted or not = On/Off).

    It's going to look like a light beam grid - four rows and three colons.

    I've been looking around in the web for hours and can't make-up my mind (to much information kills the information...) on which system is best to use.

    In my opinion, the simplest, cheapest & smallest way to do would be to use common leds with a narrow beam as emitters and, on the other side, as receivers, photodiodes.

    Another way would be to use IR leds. The advantage here seems to be that I could "code" the light beam to avoid interferences and make it more reliable. But I never used them up to now so I don't know if I can use the same IR leds as emitters and as receivers and if this solution is better or not.

    Does anyone of you had some experience with this he could share?

    Thanks a lot for any advice.
    Roger

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Iowa, USA
    Posts
    216


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by flotulopex View Post
    Hello,
    Another way would be to use IR leds. The advantage here seems to be that I could "code" the light beam to avoid interferences and make it more reliable. But I never used them up to now so I don't know if I can use the same IR leds as emitters and as receivers and if this solution is better or not.
    We use a product like this in our manufacturing processes for error proofing parts picking. There is an array of IR LEDS and receivers... I think upto 150 in each axis. Basically creates an IR grid system. An external controller will send the expected pick string to the unit. It will light up the appropriate bins with light bars for the operator to pick from. Once the operator sticks his/her hand in the lighted location, it turns off the light for that bin and the operator moves to the next lighted bin. If he/she were to stick there hand in the wrong bin, the system recognizes this and beeps and them and begins flashing the light bar for the bin they are supposed to pick from. We do have interference problems from time to time due to receiver sensitivity. For this, there are jumpers to adjust the emitter power.
    If I were designing a small scale version, I'd think about pulsing the emitters at a different frequency and detecting that frequency for the appropriate receiver. Don't know if that makes it any more simple or robust, but maybe something to think about.
    Wisdom is knowing what path to take next... Integrity is taking it.
    Ryan Miller

  3. #3
    skimask's Avatar
    skimask Guest


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by flotulopex View Post
    Hello,
    I have to make a kind of keyboard where the buttons are replaced by seven small light beam control (barrières lumineuses - Lichtschranke) having to check a distance of 10 centimeters (is the beam interrupted or not = On/Off).
    It's going to look like a light beam grid - four rows and three colons.
    I've been looking around in the web for hours and can't make-up my mind (to much information kills the information...) on which system is best to use.
    In my opinion, the simplest, cheapest & smallest way to do would be to use common leds with a narrow beam as emitters and, on the other side, as receivers, photodiodes.
    Another way would be to use IR leds. The advantage here seems to be that I could "code" the light beam to avoid interferences and make it more reliable. But I never used them up to now so I don't know if I can use the same IR leds as emitters and as receivers and if this solution is better or not.
    Does anyone of you had some experience with this he could share?
    Thanks a lot for any advice.
    I don't know if this is what you're looking for...but I thought what I built was cool...
    www.srt.com/~jdgrotte click the LED Touch Sensor link and watch the video (which is really bad quality, someday I'll update it).

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    SWITZERLAND (french speaking)
    Posts
    938


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Cool stuff, skimask.

    I've seen your video some times ago and your explanation about how to do/use it is really great

    In my case, distance between the "finger" and the LED is greater and needs more precision. Take a look at the drawing I made to see what the distances will be (more or less).

    Each beam is 1 centimeter distant from another and the distance from one LED to it's corresponding photodiode is about 10 centimeters.

    I'll have to "cut" two beams (row/colon) to get a correct coordinate.

    So I need to have a very narrow beam to locate precisely where my finger (or an object) will be positionned.
    <img src ="http://www.picbasic.co.uk/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=1569&stc=1&d=117747937 7">
    Again, the question is: what light emitting and detecting system is the best?
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Roger

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    4,132


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Why don't you modulate each pair with different carrier? Also I think you have to play with the power that Tx LEDs will emit.

    Ioannis

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Iowa, USA
    Posts
    216


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ioannis View Post
    Why don't you modulate each pair with different carrier? Also I think you have to play with the power that Tx LEDs will emit.

    Ioannis
    That's a better description of what I was trying to say.
    Wisdom is knowing what path to take next... Integrity is taking it.
    Ryan Miller

  7. #7
    skimask's Avatar
    skimask Guest


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rhino View Post
    That's a better description of what I was trying to say.
    I think I smell what you're cooking. I saw it on one of those shows talking about Ford Motor Company's assemblies processes.
    How big are the boxes themselves?
    How many are there going to be?
    Last edited by skimask; - 25th April 2007 at 18:35. Reason: Changed BIGS to BOXES (don't know what I was typing there!)

Members who have read this thread : 0

You do not have permission to view the list of names.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts