Probably wouldn't be a bad idea. Add a byte for a 'data identifier number' and a checksum or something like that so you can receive the same data more than once but only act on it once and only if it's correct.Originally Posted by oneohthree
|
Probably wouldn't be a bad idea. Add a byte for a 'data identifier number' and a checksum or something like that so you can receive the same data more than once but only act on it once and only if it's correct.
Members who have read this thread : 0You do not have permission to view the list of names.
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks