Those wacky Microchip Designers!


Closed Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Vermont
    Posts
    373

    Default Those wacky Microchip Designers!

    I guess this is a bit of a gripe, but maybe there is a legit answer to this question. I seem to be working with more and more pins on a single processor these days. Why do they split some of the ports? Fer instance, on the 18F4520 in the TQFP, ports C and D are split right down the middle. Is there a legit reason for this, or more convenient in the die fabrication?
    Ron

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    4,959


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    I can't say how it ended up that way in the first place, but I think at this point it's just a matter of compatability with previous designs.

    The 18F4520 is based on the 18F452 who's pinout was made to be compatible with previous 44pin devices such as the 16F877.

    Within each group, there are many similarities.
    ie. Many 18-pin devices share the same pin configurations as well.

    _
    DT

  3. #3
    T.Jackson's Avatar
    T.Jackson Guest


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Post

    I agree with that - possibly for compatibility reasons to help make the switch across as painless as possible.
    Last edited by T.Jackson; - 26th May 2007 at 04:03.

  4. #4
    skimask's Avatar
    skimask Guest


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Marcus View Post
    I guess this is a bit of a gripe, but maybe there is a legit answer to this question. I seem to be working with more and more pins on a single processor these days. Why do they split some of the ports? Fer instance, on the 18F4520 in the TQFP, ports C and D are split right down the middle. Is there a legit reason for this, or more convenient in the die fabrication?
    Ron
    Ever noticed how you can ALMOST put a 28 pin DIP PIC into a 40 pin DIP PIC socket? Or for that matter, you could (again ALMOST) put an 18 pin PIC into a 40 pin PIC socket.
    Same thing for the TQFP. With the 18F672x (64pin TQFP) and the 18F872x (80pin TQFP), everything is in the same place except for the 16 corners pins. I used that to make my 64/80 TQFP adapter board, which has a 40 pin IDC ribbon cable header to plug a 672x/872x into a socket previously occupied by 877, 452, and a 4620, but with loads more memory. And I use another header holding the rest of the pins to run another PCB.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    montreal, canada
    Posts
    6,898


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    In general it should be true... we know Microchip You can also fit most 28dip in the same 28dip socket as well... i said most... 18F2431 don't have RA5(or else I/O) ... but Vcc ... dear Microchip
    Steve

    It's not a bug, it's a random feature.
    There's no problem, only learning opportunities.

Similar Threads

  1. Microchip Code Issues
    By Destovi in forum General
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: - 20th March 2008, 13:32
  2. PBP is no longer a stranger to Microchip
    By MarioC in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: - 12th March 2008, 22:59
  3. 18F2550 MCRL/RE3 problem with USB bootloader Microchip
    By Ronald123 in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: - 24th September 2007, 10:48
  4. Replies: 1
    Last Post: - 22nd June 2007, 00:57
  5. Microchip CDC Firmware with My OWN VID/PID ?
    By viewgsm in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: - 8th June 2007, 02:33

Members who have read this thread : 0

You do not have permission to view the list of names.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts