Perhaps the Epic programmer is the difference that really matters. I seem to recall something being said on the MEL site about the Epic programmer being involved with setting things right if the odd number sequence was used (unfortunately this topic was completely removed from the section it once appeared in on the MEL site). Perhaps the Epic programmer is now working against me, since the EEprom problem has presumably been fixed in PBP itself. Although once again, when I look at the upgrade info to version 2.45 for the Epic programmer nothing is mentioned about this at all.
Oh well. I can live with it for the time being, or at least until I get better confirmation on what is happening. However it would be nice to know, especially for other people's sake that may be trying to use the same combination of tools as I am (and tearing their hair out trying to preload the EEprom during compilation with sequential DATA addressing).
On a separate note: You said you don't use MicroCode Studio. What IDE are you using?
I am using a PIC18F252 Dip 28 package running a 10 Mhz xtal with PLL set to x4What 18F is causing you grief? I'll order one in if I don't have it and give it a spin...
Thanks for the quick reply and trying to help me out. It's appreciatted.
Bookmarks