Communications headset tester


Closed Thread
Results 1 to 21 of 21

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    skimask's Avatar
    skimask Guest

    Default Communications headset tester

    This is quite a ways out there for a PIC forum, but at least I'm in the Off-Topic section... so here goes....

    I do some work on the side for a company fixing communications headsets. Usually, it's the standard stuff, broken wires at the connector, wiring pulled out, dead microphones, etc. And it's really old technology, but it works.

    A couple of months ago, I started to get this different type of headset into the shop that I can't wrap my brain around. It's a military type headset used for ground communications and as far as I can tell, the earpieces are your standard 600ohm speakers, the microphone is a dynamic element (150ohm I think, I can't find the spec's on it). There is also a push-button inline with the cord which is a push-to-talk button. Even that's not difficult.

    What's wierd about it is that there is a circuit board inline with this switch case. I can't make out what this board does, amplifier, filter, whatever. It's got 2 transistors (1 2N3906 and the other I think is another 3906 but the numbers are scratched up), 3 capacitors, 4 resistors, and a trimmer pot. I don't think it's an amplifier since that would require an external power source (no batteries inside this case).

    About a month ago, I found this tester for these headsets laying in the back corner. Of course it didn't work. I was told by a guy that's been there since WAY back when that basically you plug the headset into it, press the push-to-talk button, blow into the mike and your hear yourself in the speakers. But he also told me that the guy that was there before him built it and he (nor anybody) has any schematic's, specifications, or anything for it. So I opened it up ('cause that what you should do right?).

    I found 2 LM386's, a single diode, 2 9V batteries, and a pot. So, knowing what I know, I resoldered the connections, replaced the batteries and tried it out. No good. I drew out the tester schematic and found the LM386's were basically wired in parallel. Well, that doesn't work in my mind, so I switched it over to standard setup for using an LM386 (pin 1 & 8 open, gain=20, + input to the pot wiper, one side of the mike to the pot, 3rd pin of pot to ground, other side of mike to ground, - input to ground, output to headphones, other side of headphones to ground, and +18v to Vd, grnd to ground, etc).

    I turned on the tester and got nothing but a squeal in the headphones unless I cranked the pot all the way to one side or the other. And of course, when I blow into the mike, I can't hear myself in the headphones.

    At the moment, I'm rewiring it and trying various different configurations for the LM386's, including running them in series for more gain, putting them back in parallel (why I don't know). I'm going to try one side of the mike to one LM386 + input, and the other side of the mike into the the other LM386 - input, with each respective LM386 output drive a side of the earphones. I'll also try configuring a single LM386 for a 200 gain instead of 20 as the datasheets read, and so on and so on.

    Question is....does anybody out there have any experience with any of these communications headsets at all, maybe seen something in the past, maybe work on them right now, maybe has a clue what this board inline with the switch might do?

    JDG

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    montreal, canada
    Posts
    6,898


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    is this a 4 pins or 6 pins connector at the end (xlr type)? if so, maybe you could compare wit some Clear-Com headset and unit?

    those bellow are much recent...
    http://www.clearcom.com/Products/par.../headsets.html

    in the past i repaired tons of white and green model.. but none had the circuit you discribe so far. everything was done with the beltpack.

    Is there any model # or company name written on?

    For sure you must have a base station somewhere to do some tests. So just probe it to get the Headphone outputs wire, mic, and probably you'll discover a Vdd line as well.
    Steve

    It's not a bug, it's a random feature.
    There's no problem, only learning opportunities.

  3. #3
    skimask's Avatar
    skimask Guest


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mister_e
    is this a 4 pins or 6 pins connector at the end (xlr type)? if so, maybe you could compare wit some Clear-Com headset and unit?

    those bellow are much recent...
    http://www.clearcom.com/Products/par.../headsets.html

    in the past i repaired tons of white and green model.. but none had the circuit you discribe so far. everything was done with the beltpack.

    Is there any model # or company name written on?

    For sure you must have a base station somewhere to do some tests. So just probe it to get the Headphone outputs wire, mic, and probably you'll discover a Vdd line as well.
    10 pins total at the connector, only 5 pins used, not an xlr type, in fact not even pins and sockets. They're almost more like a BGA chip and the outside shell of the connector does the job of applying the pressure by latching them together. I wish I had one here at the house so I could get a picture.

    In forgot to mention in my last post, on the few headsets that I've gotten in that don't have that circuit I described earlier (and they don't work either!), on those 5 pins at the connector, I've got 1 to the braided shield (ground), 2 to the mike, and 2 to the earphones.

    No company name or anything on them anywhere to be found, a couple of model numbers on the various plugs and one on the mike and earpiece. The books say to order a new one from Roanwell, which I called and doesn't sell them anymore (in fact they don't know anything about them).

    I've got a functional station to test them out at, problem is it's about 12 miles away which is why I kinda want to rebuild this tester for the shop. I've probed it. Nothing spectacular. That same ground pin on the headsets, goes to the chassis of the box. If I touch 5v across the mike contacts at my station, I get clicks in earpieces at another station. If I touch 5v across the earpiece contacts at my station, I get light clicks in the mike at the other station, which is what I would expect. So, that tells me that I've got the right pins for the right job.

    Maybe your beltpack and my switch/box/circuit board might have something in common. Next week, I'll try to reverse engineer that board and see what I come with. That'll probably tell me everything I need to know.

    JDG

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    montreal, canada
    Posts
    6,898


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Ok,
    so i guess it's probably miles away... or not. mmm, all beltpack/base station etc etc, were connected together via 3 pin XLRs. They called that Party-Line.

    Try to draw a schematic of your existing tester board. It may reveal some interesting stuff. Same for the transistor board on the headset.

    Sure it's doable... If it worked.. it can work again.

    Don't give up!
    Steve

    It's not a bug, it's a random feature.
    There's no problem, only learning opportunities.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    126


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Is it possible the inline box it could be some kind of volume limiter circuit for the headset? I know in European broadcast stations that all the headphones have to be fitted with dB limiters to stop the operators from damaging their hearing.
    http://www.canford.co.uk/commerce/it...1_2001812.aspx for example.

    Most of them use back to back diodes, but if it is military gear they have the money to do things the expensive way...

    Bill.

  6. #6
    skimask's Avatar
    skimask Guest


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bcd
    Is it possible the inline box it could be some kind of volume limiter circuit for the headset? I know in European broadcast stations that all the headphones have to be fitted with dB limiters to stop the operators from damaging their hearing.
    http://www.canford.co.uk/commerce/it...1_2001812.aspx for example.

    Most of them use back to back diodes, but if it is military gear they have the money to do things the expensive way...

    Bill.

    Interesting thought. The 2 transistors on the board, while they aren't diodes, can sure be set up to act like it.
    JDG

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    695


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Hi,

    Original headset:

    The original headset uses an electret microphone. (Phantom powered).

    * * *

    Modified headset:

    The circuit board is an amplifier for the dynamic microphone.
    The circuit emulates an electret microphone.
    The circuit is phantom powered.

    Best regards,

    Luciano

  8. #8
    skimask's Avatar
    skimask Guest


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Luciano
    Hi,

    Original headset:

    The original headset uses an electret microphone. (Phantom powered).

    * * *

    Modified headset:

    The circuit board is an amplifier for the dynamic microphone.
    The circuit emulates an electret microphone.
    The circuit is phantom powered.

    Best regards,

    Luciano

    Correct me if I'm wrong.
    Electret mike - don't need power, just am amp, like the earpiece.
    Dynamic mike - Feed power to the mike on one pin, like a pre-bias voltage; connect an amp on the other pin.

    I probed the connector without the headset plugged in and didn't get any power on any of the pins (well, a few mV, but it was very jumpy, so I figured it was being induced from somewhere).

    How are you guessing that the original configuration might've been electret? Is that 'just the way it's always been' ?


    Jeeze...this would be so much easier if I had a datasheet for the things!!!!
    JDG

  9. #9
    skimask's Avatar
    skimask Guest


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mister_e
    Ok,
    so i guess it's probably miles away... or not. mmm, all beltpack/base station etc etc, were connected together via 3 pin XLRs. They called that Party-Line.

    Try to draw a schematic of your existing tester board. It may reveal some interesting stuff. Same for the transistor board on the headset.

    Sure it's doable... If it worked.. it can work again.

    Don't give up!

    That's just it. The tester box itself is almost stupidly-simple, just an LM386 amp. Shouldn't be a problem with that right? Not so much.... As near as I can figure, the guy that designed/built the tester box is probably around 115 years old by now. Not much of a chance of getting useful info from him.

    And the schematics will come next week sometime. It will probably be clear as day as soon as I draw it out.
    JDG
    Last edited by skimask; - 9th December 2006 at 21:09.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    2


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Time Machine?

    Just maybe....

  11. #11
    skimask's Avatar
    skimask Guest


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Comm headsets

    I drew out the schematic for the circuit board inside the push-to-talk switch, and while I probably had a few connections wrong, it looked a lot like a few of those example 'dynamic to electret' converter schematics I saw on .epanorama.

    AND...somehow I found an old schematic for a headset tester. The paper is all beat up and barely readable, so I could be wrong on a number of points.

    It looks to me like power (18v, 2 9v back-to-back) comes in, goes thru a 1K resistor (and a 1K pot for volume control I assume) and feeds one side of the electret mike (which is actually the output from the dynamic mike run thru the converter circuit mentioned above), then across a small cap, connected to the other side of the mike, which is also grounded.

    The 1st output of the mike (nearest to power thru the 1K resistor) is fed directly into the + input of the LM386 thru a coupling cap. The output of the '386 back to the headsets thru a coupling cap. Nothing on the gain pins, '386 negative input to ground, bypass open.

    Now that's the way I figured it would run. However the actual tester unit that I have, has 2 LM386's in it (and again, it was ruined by another shop, not me). If I had to guess, I would say that the output from the 1st '386 fed the input of the 2nd '386 and back out to the headsets from there.

    Shouldn't the negative input of the '386s be connected to the output or is that just when using op-amps, since the '386 has a gain of 20 with nothing connected to 1 & 8. Or am I wrong again....

    JDG

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    montreal, canada
    Posts
    6,898


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    i guess the guy used 2 LM386 in a bridge configuration to have more Juice at the output. So i guess each LM output go to the headset.

    OR one is the mic preamp, the other one the power amp...

    download the LM386 datasheet, you'll see what i mean. Maybe it's something copy/paste from there...
    Steve

    It's not a bug, it's a random feature.
    There's no problem, only learning opportunities.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    695


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Hi,

    If you are interested, I can post a circuit
    based on the TBA820M audio amplifier.
    You can use this circuit for the headset tester.

    IC TBA820M (8-DIP).
    Digi-Key Part Number: 497-3025-5-ND
    Price: USD 1.35

    Circuit description:

    Input: Electret microphone. (Phantom powered).
    Output: 4 to 600 ohm.

    Used components:

    One IC TBA820M
    One 9V battery
    One on-off switch
    Six resistors
    Seven capacitors

    * * *

    Let me know and I will post the schematic of the circuit.

    Best regards,

    Luciano

  14. #14
    skimask's Avatar
    skimask Guest


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Luciano
    Hi,

    If you are interested, I can post a circuit
    based on the TBA820M audio amplifier.
    You can use this circuit for the headset tester.

    IC TBA820M (8-DIP).
    Digi-Key Part Number: 497-3025-5-ND
    Price: USD 1.35

    Circuit description:

    Input: Electret microphone. (Phantom powered).
    Output: 4 to 600 ohm.

    Used components:

    One IC TBA820M
    One 9V battery
    One on-off switch
    Six resistors
    Seven capacitors

    * * *

    Let me know and I will post the schematic of the circuit.

    Best regards,

    Luciano

    I grabbed the datasheet. I'll see what happens.
    JDG

Similar Threads

  1. RS232 communications issue
    By DiverBob in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: - 8th December 2009, 02:07
  2. Digital IC Tester
    By precision in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: - 18th September 2006, 03:38
  3. PIC Basic Pro <-> HP-IL communications
    By swr999 in forum Serial
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: - 6th March 2006, 18:30
  4. PIC Basic Pro <-> HP-IL communications
    By swr999 in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: - 6th March 2006, 18:22
  5. Problems with Asyncronous Communications
    By BertMan in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: - 2nd December 2005, 00:48

Members who have read this thread : 0

You do not have permission to view the list of names.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts