Need hardware advice: ULN2003A


Closed Thread
Results 1 to 40 of 50

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Istanbul
    Posts
    1,185


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    If you are not using all of the available arrays, you may want to make a parallel connection of the empty ones; thus providing a higher current both through the transistors and diodes.
    "If the Earth were a single state, Istanbul would be its capital." Napoleon Bonaparte

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    425


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Good idea!

    Actually, I am only using two of the seven available outputs. Are you saying to "gang" together something like 3 inputs and 4 inputs then 3 outputs and 4 outputs? Would this provide better protection if the collapsing field is in question?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Istanbul
    Posts
    1,185


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Since the load will be divided by the number of arrays you make in parallel, technically it would.

    Datasheet has no detailed info on the diodes though, but the darlingtons support parallel connection and datasheet confirms this.


    ------------
    "If the Earth were a single state, Istanbul would be its capital." Napoleon Bonaparte

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    425


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    So, here is what I am thinking. If the field is 77mA and it is ganged together with three outputs, it is esentially like switching a coil current of approximately 26mA and the collapsing field has three different paths to go. This is below the 50mA that Melanie said she has used before. Is my thinking correct?

    Thanks,

    Chris

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Istanbul
    Posts
    1,185


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Post

    Your thinking is "technically" correct of course.

    Practically it "should" be correct. Since Melanie has a practical experience, so I say go for it.
    "If the Earth were a single state, Istanbul would be its capital." Napoleon Bonaparte

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    montreal, canada
    Posts
    6,898


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    if you only use 2 driver... why not using SOT transistors/Mosfet instead?
    Steve

    It's not a bug, it's a random feature.
    There's no problem, only learning opportunities.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    425


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    I am a creature of habit. If I have used an IC that I know works well and I have not had no problems with it, I will use it in future designs.

Similar Threads

  1. Need "PIC16F84A" Controler schematic Advice...
    By Kyo_89 in forum Schematics
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: - 27th May 2009, 23:03
  2. Hardware I2C
    By Kamikaze47 in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: - 13th March 2008, 13:24
  3. using hardware ports
    By sebapostigo in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: - 19th November 2007, 22:01
  4. Advice needed on 'neat' Project!
    By vacpress in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: - 11th February 2007, 06:21
  5. PBP hardware oriented?
    By mpavlica in forum PBP Wish List
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: - 15th June 2005, 06:18

Members who have read this thread : 0

You do not have permission to view the list of names.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts