STR ? never heard of it !



But I have changed the code some, I was worried that if I did something like this



for n=1 to 10:serin wanted data(n):next
for n=1 to 10:serin garbage data(n):next
for n=1 to 10:serin wanted data(n):next

I thought I may miss a byte between statements, but I'm not, I suppose I'm just lucky or the codes just fast enough to keep up at 1200 baud.

I guess I should have used the skip command but once again I cant seem to win the battle of the syntax when also using the wait command, can they not be used in the same instance?(anyone!)