Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: I thought PORTA.0[33] was the same as PORTE.1 ?!?

Thread Tools
- Show Printable Version
- Subscribe to this Thread…
Search Thread
- Advanced Search
Display
- Switch to Linear Mode
- Switch to Hybrid Mode
- Threaded Mode

Threaded View

- 19th July 2006, 22:23 #3

blainecf Guest

Good or bad, I'm NOT using numbered ports

I'm really hoping you have a solution. Please enlighten...

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Similar Threads

More space than I thought !!!

By keithdoxey in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro

Replies: 3
Last Post: - 10th August 2006, 21:04
16F88 is not the dream device I thought it was.

By keithdoxey in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro

Replies: 5
Last Post: - 25th October 2005, 22:19
What is the Pin Number for PortE.1? on 18F458

By khufumen in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro

Replies: 5
Last Post: - 2nd June 2005, 17:13

Members who have read this thread : 0

You do not have permission to view the list of names.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Rules

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 00:36.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
Admin byLester,
PIC, PICmicro, dsPIC,MPLAB,PICBASIC, PICBASIC PRO, PICPROTO, and EPIC are trademarks of Microchip Technology Inc. in the USA and other countries.

Thread: I thought PORTA.0[33] was the same as PORTE.1 ?!?

Thread Tools

Search Thread

Display

Threaded View

Good or bad, I'm NOT using numbered ports

Similar Threads

More space than I thought !!!

16F88 is not the dream device I thought it was.

What is the Pin Number for PortE.1? on 18F458

Members who have read this thread : 0

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions