Interesting... I didn't know it did that.
Yet another reason to Not use PM.
DT
I guess I better update the <a href="http://www.picbasic.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=3891">EXT</a> thread to read MPASM only for the lookup Table. Thanks.
Interesting... I didn't know it did that.
Yet another reason to Not use PM.
DT
I guess I better update the <a href="http://www.picbasic.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=3891">EXT</a> thread to read MPASM only for the lookup Table. Thanks.
OK,
I switched to MPASM. Just look inside the Include-files of the MPASM to figure out the __config-command,
comment it out in the Include-files of the PBP .... ;-(
Then it works!
I got 14-Bit-values in the flash ! This seems to be a weak part of MP ! ;-(
I preffered to use MP, because the errors are located inside the code....
PBP 2.50C, MCS+ 3.0.0.5, MPLAB 8, MPASM 5.14, ASIX Presto, PoScope, mE mikroBasic V7.2, PICKIT2
That's an interesting finding dudes! As Darrel's said, yet another reason to not use PM!
MPASM allow too much interesting feature that PM doesn't. Also, as a major reason of using it, it works with ALL PIC. But it also assume than the person back of the keyboard use/understand and want to use those feature. As assembler seems to be a common fear here... i doubt many will change their mind and use MPASM only for the reasons we stated.
Anyways, thanks BigWumpus and Darrel.
Oh Darrel, you finnally got me with the INCLUDE file. In conjuction with MESSG (for kinda help file) they're really usefull. Apologies!
Last edited by mister_e; - 17th May 2006 at 15:11.
Steve
It's not a bug, it's a random feature.
There's no problem, only learning opportunities.
Hi Steve, that's Great!
I guess I can check off your name in my list of people to convert to Include files.
Let's see... 2 down, and 2,435 to go. Now we're cooking.
DT
LMAO! Well at least, there's some progress![]()
Steve
It's not a bug, it's a random feature.
There's no problem, only learning opportunities.
Bookmarks