Good to hear Bill.
But what is the problem with 16f's? Mine compiles without errors for a 16f876a, if I change the ports to match. But I don't have a way to test it here.
Good to hear Bill.
But what is the problem with 16f's? Mine compiles without errors for a 16f876a, if I change the ports to match. But I don't have a way to test it here.
Hi Walter,
Making the appropriate changes per chip (cmcon, adcon, etc.) and my same code with the same INC file as compiles correctly with the 18F252, I have no luck with a 16F648A or 16F876A.
I thought the INC font string may have been too long also so shortened it to about half its size but no difference. Here is what I get...
With a 16F648A:
Error[113] e:\wjs\pbp260\pbppic14.lib 449 : Symbol not previously defined [EEADRH]
Message[303] e:\wjs\pbp\NOD157~1.ASM 185 : Program word too large. Truncated to core size. (4920)
too many errors
With a 16F876A there are 20 lines of:
Message[303] e:\wjs\pbp\NOD157~1.ASM 187 : Program word too large. Truncated to core size. (4920)
Does this give you any ideas where my problem with 16F's is? What are the chip requirements for using this macro - codespace, ram size, etc,?
Thanks and regards,
Bill
Bookmarks