Transformerless Power Suppply


Closed Thread
Results 1 to 40 of 76

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    2,358


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Sure, continue this by email, as I can then send you the product Datasheet so you can see if it fits your requirements.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Istanbul
    Posts
    1,185


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Smile Capacitor Value for Your Circuit

    Upon the discussion with Melanie, attached is the capacitor value table for the current (mA) that your circuit draws.

    Table is quite simple to figure out.

    Table is for 110V@60Hz and 220V@50Hz.

    Example: If your circuit draws 12mA, and your power line is 110V 60Hz, then, you use 0.289uF (290nF) for C2 in the circuit that Melanie posted here.

    Of course you will have to adjust D2 and VDR accordingly.

    If this table is any help to anyone!


    Regards
    Attached Files Attached Files
    "If the Earth were a single state, Istanbul would be its capital." Napoleon Bonaparte

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    2,358


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Nice table, but if you limited the Capacitor values to those dozen or so X2 values available (eg 10n, 22n, 47n, 100n, 220n etc, etc), you'll be able to pick the one closest to your current requirement. No point in having a 290n value when you can't buy one, and putting heaps in parallel negates the advantages (cost, size and weight) of a transformerless design to start with.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Istanbul
    Posts
    1,185


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    Yes, of course.

    Just as in your design, C2 is 470nF but in the table the nearest value is 477nF.

    I am sure 330nF can also be used there although is not a near value.

    Similar to this example, one can look at the table and pick a range.

    I will try to make this table as an active WEB page so the user can enter the values of Frequency and Current then have an info for the capacitor range that "can" be used.

    -----------------
    "If the Earth were a single state, Istanbul would be its capital." Napoleon Bonaparte

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Mumbai,India
    Posts
    43


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Exclamation Melanie's X2 type attachment!

    I have seen in many posts that Melanie is asking to use X2 capacitors.
    For the requirement of circuit the value posted in tb008 is correctly just
    470n 400V type. These are available at half price than X2 types because
    X2 are required for special protection function and 'never short' across the
    mains requirement.
    Also the resistor across this capacitor can be 220k 1/4 W instead of 100K
    1Watt. This resistor is for discharging capacitor when ckt is not in use and
    not for providing resistive current. Those who are having 110V/60Hz should
    double value and save money.
    If one is not finding proper value of capacitor then it is not good that
    one should have much higher value available. If used then low voltage regulators (zener or series type ) will dissipate much more power and may
    burn out. Consider that this ckt is constant current generator and that when no load is there it will be dissipated in zener. It is better that shunt type
    voltage regulators are designed with proper wattage rating so that there is
    no problem later.
    ( I had been manufacturing X2 and normal plastic film capacitors for more than 12 years in India)

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    2,358


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default

    There is a reason I specify X2... and you said it yourself... "they (are specified to) never short accross". If in a Transformerless Power Supply the Capacitor DID short accross it would be very bad news!!! If you don't fit X2's, then yes, your costs are very much reduced, but do you want to take the risk?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Mumbai,India
    Posts
    43


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Thumbs down Question of costs and safety!

    Quote Originally Posted by Melanie
    There is a reason I specify X2... and you said it yourself... "they (are specified to) never short accross". If in a Transformerless Power Supply the Capacitor DID short accross it would be very bad news!!! If you don't fit X2's, then yes, your costs are very much reduced, but do you want to take the risk?
    This whole thread, I think, is on the brink of veering off!
    When U are choosing a very low cost alternative there are many conditions
    which are subject to be adhered. first being a circuit a "live" it is not to be
    used as any run of mill usage like powering something which can get body
    contact. Secondly if "safety" being prime concern then why use "transformerless " supply at all? If I have to get 'risk' of capacitor shorting
    eliminated I would rather use a double wound txr and add the cost to safety
    of supply!!! Some people are just attached to fancy of some components and
    don't look at overall concept of a circuit or device.
    How nice it will be if everyone should consider to buy a Merc or BMW as
    it won't let U down in middle of road like small car?
    For Melani's information we men like to live dangerous but do consult
    our purse before risking our reputation in hotel or pub !

Similar Threads

  1. Transformerless Power Supply of 1A at 5Volts!
    By Ioannis in forum Schematics
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: - 10th September 2016, 21:17
  2. Battery powered applications
    By NavMicroSystems in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: - 22nd June 2009, 07:12
  3. Transformerless Power supply
    By nikhil in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: - 17th January 2007, 07:07
  4. Replies: 10
    Last Post: - 16th October 2006, 18:23
  5. Transformerless Power Supply
    By volkov in forum General
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: - 2nd July 2006, 23:13

Members who have read this thread : 1

You do not have permission to view the list of names.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts