Instant Interrupts - Revisited

[sayzer]

You mean that comparing to On-Interrupt of PBP you did a reduction of 3100?

Ioannis

Hi Ioannis,

Actually I tried different codes after this experiment and came up with these simple results.

1. In a relatively large code, DT's 18F int routine saves a lot of code space compared to On-Interrupt of PBP as you said.
Ex: I saved 3100 bytes for the same code (code size : approx. 18,000 bytes).

2. In a small code, DT's 18F routine becomes code hungry.
Ex: PBP On-Interrupt produces 318 bytes for a sample code I just tried, but
DT's 18F int routine produces 762 bytes. More then twice larger!


As the code gets longer, DT's int routine gets handier I suppose.