Ohh! dear....Originally Posted by mister_e
Thanks,
Ioannis
Hello Steve,
Any idea in getting your code to work (compile) with PM. ?
That would be a big help.
thank you for the shareing the code.
regards
Nope, i have no idea and no plan to do it.
I NEVER use PM, it really don't worth to use it anyways... sorry![]()
Steve
It's not a bug, it's a random feature.
There's no problem, only learning opportunities.
I know of NO reason why anyone should still be using PM.
If you don't use ASM then it'll handle PBP just fine. But if you do use ASM, PM will cause nothing but problems. I never use it anymore either.
However, before I found out how much better MPASM is, I used PM for a year or 2, and am probably more familiar with it than Steve.
So here's Steve's Kepad.bas, modified to work with PM.exe
This version will NOT work with MPASM
Don't forget to remove the .txt extension.
HTH,
DT
i has the advantages to be 'user configurable' and support many matrix Keypad type... up to 8X8.
Can be used in a Timer interrupt as well, so you can read from it when you want, etc etc.
Enjoy!
Steve
It's not a bug, it's a random feature.
There's no problem, only learning opportunities.
It looks quite comprehensive.
I tend to base most of my algorithms around direct logic - boolean algebraic structures - rather than continuous mathematics, i.e calculations. PIC's are not as well equipped for calculations.
Thanks Darrel.
Unfortunately I still use PM and maybe I am facing all problems because of that. I shall shift over to MPASM and see the difference.
Today my biggest problem is to get a 16F628A to sleep and wake it on INT on Change B4...B7. This is in conjuction with a keypad rotuine I am working on for a keylock project.
I think I must change over and see (experience) the difference myself
Thank you steve for this wonderful thread.
regards
Bookmarks