Nicely stated and thanks for spelling it out....at least for me.

Now that's Manchester for dummies without the gobble dee gook.

I felt it must have been a 2x code for 1x code or something when I saw it come up in discussions about wireless.

The opposite of compression? More bits for the same thing?

I still have some problems with a bit of code that works fine wired but not wireless.

I would think 2 or 3 qualifiers in a serout string would be good enough for wireless and do the same thing.

?