Oh by the way...
If you're so totally in love with Proton, why on earth do you spend so much time on the PBP forum?
Why are you not sharing your obvious wealth of knowledge with Proton users on their forum?
Yeah i know you`re e registered PBP owner but, if PROTON is the only you use...
Also read the Proton todays post under 18F8722 AND Consider this
Added support for devices: - v3.1.7
18F6310, 18F6390, 18F6410, 18F6490, 18F6520, 18F6525, 18F6621, 18F6622, 18F6627, 18F6722
18F8310, 18F8390, 18F8410, 18F8490, 18F8520, 18F8525, 18F8621, 18F8627, 18F8722
When all you have done is to copy/paste "14-bit core" header files, is this really added support?
No one could have ever tested a "single line of code" on these new processors with this
NEW version of this compiler, so how the hell do they know the compiler works with them?
Why should anyone trust a compiler when they can't even get the header files correct?
I simply do NOT have the time to sit & verify hundreds of header files against a datasheet
before I use the compiler or a new PIC. Even an old PIC. How do I trust the header files if
I don't sit down & verify "every single one" first?
These files are "WAY" too important to simply clone for all new processors.
Do "I" trust it. Absolutely NOT.
Oh well i guess i'd go "WAY" too far this time. Sorry for sensitive ears 
Last edited by mister_e; - 19th January 2006 at 02:17.
Steve
It's not a bug, it's a random feature.
There's no problem, only learning opportunities.
Bookmarks