PBP2.46, MPLAB and PM assembler.

[Darrel Taylor]

Hi Alain,

Doesn't help your problem, but I saw this line
MPASM ... with the "putmulresult" macro ( THE reason to use PM ...)

The "PutMulResult" macro works fine with MPASM too. No need for PM.
<br>

[Acetronics2]

Hi Alain,

The "PutMulResult" macro works fine with MPASM too. No need for PM.
<br>

Hi, Darrel

As you could have read some lines further ...

Warning[207] C:\PROGRAM FILES\MICROCHIP\MPLAB IDE\PROJETS\ACETACHY.ASM 430 : Found label after column 1. (putmulresult)
Error[108] C:\PROGRAM FILES\MICROCHIP\MPLAB IDE\PROJETS\ACETACHY.ASM 430 : Illegal character (6)

Do you call that working fine ???

I don't even know if the code produced is correct ... but no Warning/Error with a 1k memory device like a 'C84 !!!

Alain

[Acetronics2]

Hi,All

I Apologize ...

Was the PBP Path uncorrect ....( auto installing v 2.46 , and placing it NOT to the same location ... it's my great fault )
Mel' ... you win some chilled Sauternes ( 1989 ... please )

BUUUUT I discovered at the same time the memory gauge works fine with PM assembler !!!

So,

With PM : Mem gauge working, but poor program memory debug info ... ( no labels, no register names )
With MPASM : no mem gauge and rich prog mem debug info, or manual mem gauge with lost debug info ...

Alain

[Darrel Taylor]

Do you call that working fine ???

Yes I do! However, it will work much better if you use the proper CASE.

"PutMulResult"

[Acetronics2]

Yes I do! However, it will work much better if you use the proper CASE.

"PutMulResult"

Hi, Darrel,

Ok for the Case sensitivy ....

Alain