This is exactly what I said at post 19
|
Re: How about String Variables?
This is exactly what I said at post 19
Steve
It's not a bug, it's a random feature.
There's no problem, only learning opportunities.
|
Re: How about String Variables?
Well - EXCUUUUUUUUUUUSE me. My screen is not "tall" enough to see post 19 and 27 at the same time. And I have a short attention span as well.
Charles Linquist
|
Re: How about String Variables?
Mine can be if I put all 6 monitors vertically in portrait mode. LMAO!
Robert
:P
|
Re: How about String Variables?
you have a high ceiling house Demon...
|
Re: How about String Variables?
OR small screen
Steve
It's not a bug, it's a random feature.
There's no problem, only learning opportunities.
|
Re: How about String Variables?
OK Now that last string of posts are just about the funniest thing I have read around here in a while.
Or else I am just so tired that I need to get some sleep... Been chasing satelite outages for the last 14 hours and about 500 miles. Spacenet decided to change frequencies in the middle of last night and I woke up to 16 sattelites down. (we use them to bring in electricity load information on a 5 minute basis from major substations in Utah, Wyoming and Nevada.
Probably just tired...
You guys and gals are a great bunch.
Dwight
These PIC's are like intricate puzzles just waiting for one to discover their secrets and MASTER their capabilities.
|
Re: How about String Variables?
Yeah, how about STRING variables?????
Strings are needed ALL THE TIME! I wish PBP would face the music and implement them! Every other compiler I see has them, why not PBP? (And No, I don't want to switch because I've got years and $ invested in this one.)
Members who have read this thread : 1You do not have permission to view the list of names.
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks