|
Re: How about String Variables?
Yea, and those who wanted to go faster than the Horse and Buggy should have just kept quiet and enjoyed the slow meandering ride
Nothing wrong with wishing for (and expecting) improvements to an allready great compiler... that is the reason PBP3 is out.
Dwight
|
Re: How about String Variables?
I agree that common string manipulation things should have been there, but Melabs decided to not do it and be like a BasicStamp alike replacement. Nothing wrong with it. Sometime you need to draw the line somewhere... they did.
There's some hope I guess.
Steve
It's not a bug, it's a random feature.
There's no problem, only learning opportunities.
|
Re: How about String Variables?
There are some pretty good work-arounds for strings already. Try
Arraywrite TestString,["This is a pretty good way to load strings into an array",0]
Hserout [Str TestString]
Charles Linquist
|
Re: How about String Variables?
This is exactly what I said at post 19
Steve
It's not a bug, it's a random feature.
There's no problem, only learning opportunities.
|
Re: How about String Variables?
Well - EXCUUUUUUUUUUUSE me. My screen is not "tall" enough to see post 19 and 27 at the same time. And I have a short attention span as well.
Charles Linquist
|
Re: How about String Variables?
Mine can be if I put all 6 monitors vertically in portrait mode. LMAO!
Robert
:P
|
Re: How about String Variables?
you have a high ceiling house Demon...
Members who have read this thread : 1You do not have permission to view the list of names.
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks