Hwpw

[richard]

I ran your program and according to the scope they all are running the same freq. with different pulse width

not really they all are running the same pulse width with different freq.

[l_gaminde]

Well, I don't know what to say. I get all the same frequency with different pulse width.
Even the program shows different pulse width.
I even went back to the pick basic plus and i'm running for with four different timers, and they all run the same frequency, and if you set it for a different frequency, they shut down pulse width, I can control

[richard]

Even the program shows different pulse width.

what do you mean ,that makes little sense

Well, I don't know what to say. I get all the same frequency with different pulse width.

my code works perfectly on the simulator and the actual hardware
post your code and schematic .

[l_gaminde]

I ran the code that you posted.

[l_gaminde]

Walking and talking on the phone does not work well.
I ran your program my scope has measure function all 3 channels showed the same frequency. But the duty cycle was the only difference. I used pbp setting ccp1, ccp2, ccp3 and ccp5 port c1, c2, and port b0, b5 there is also no control of individual frequency only duty cycle

[richard]

If you don't get three frequencies with 50% duty cycle then you are not using my code ,chip or schema.


Post your code and schema

[l_gaminde]

I will rerun tomorrow and post scope pictures. Its
definitely possible. I did something wrong. I am only running at 40 MHz. At this time, I have 16 mhz crystal's coming.

[richard]

I have 16 mhz crystal's coming.

totally not needed for this simple test, it uses internal osc