This is not a heatsink. It is a sample of heatsink!
Ioannis
This is not a heatsink. It is a sample of heatsink!
Ioannis
Tested the TPS56637 against my prototyping board. It's operating beyond expectations for heat. The only thing I could improve is the ripples in the lines. I think max peak-to-peak was 22mV during preliminary tests, and the TI's Webench power designer tool said 11.73mV.
It took a lot of trial and error playing with capacitors,, but I've found a happy medium that runs under 11mV except for the LED strip.
As I say in the video, I'm going to reorganize the board so the TPS56637 is in the middle, and all breadboard rails get individual VDD/VSS lines. the only drawback is that I'm going to lose that centralized row of input capacitors, but I've already got an idea to solve this as I'm typing.
And I'm not sure what I'm going to do with that bank of capacitors on the breadboard. There's about 18 of each (I just emptied my box compartment). I did notice that it costs some mV to feed all those caps.
I'd really like to keep a MOSFET for the LED strip cause right now I'm limiting how much current it consumes (I think it's 180mA). But if the TPS can supply so much more efficiently, I'm thinking of letting the PWM rate go up a bit higher. It'll all depend on how the TPS behaves with 3 LED strips connected.
My Creality Ender 3 S1 Plus is a giant paperweight that can't even be used as a boat anchor, cause I'd be fined for polluting our waterways with electronic devices.
Not as dumb as yesterday, but stupider than tomorrow!
I am glad you got the results you hoped for.
With all those ground loops and the probe cable also, I'd expect much more noise of that!
Usually to measure noise on a regulators rail, you would ditch the cable with the crocodile clip and use a coil spring to earth the probe as close as possible near the tip.
Adding so much capacitance, from a certain point on, is not worth it as much as have good grounds.
Congrats,
Ioannis
Bookmarks