Has anyone tried AI with PICBASIC

[rsocor01]

and that is funny thing.
Human can learn from other works and create his art, literature or music based on that - this is fine. But same not fine for AI?

Humans can get sued for plagiarism, patent infringement, etc. AI cannot.

[Ioannis]

But the company that owns the AI can be sued...

Humans can create new content. AI does not have this feature (yet). It only copy pastes fast with millions of options.

Ioannis

[rsocor01]

True. The company that owns the AI can get sued.

I'm not an expert on AI or even close to be one, but I believe that AI can create new content. For example, it can create a new painting, a new book writing, or code if you tell it what to do. I think that graphic designers are one of the professions getting hit the harder by AI.

[Ioannis]

From my experience so far, it creates “new” content based on what it found from entire the available knowledge. It is not new content but a collection of statistical findings.

Sure there is potential and every day it gets better. I do not know where it is now but I am sure it will be able to create distinct and unique content soon.

Ioannis

[richard]

From my experience so far, it creates “new” content based on what it found from entire the available knowledge. It is not new content but a collection of statistical findings.

or just morally bankrupt

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-08-...e=abc_news_web

first nations people have it bad enough, stealing their artwork is so unnecessary

[CuriousOne]

Not correct comparison.
For example, there is Baroque - style in music, architecture, art. A lot of artists worked in that genre, so this is plagiarism?
Or other movements in arts and literature, like pointillism, impressionism, cubism and so on.

So all what's going on is completely normal and understandable and modern day AI haters can be directly compared to luddites. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luddite

[Ioannis]

or just morally bankrupt

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-08-...e=abc_news_web

first nations people have it bad enough, stealing their artwork is so unnecessary

Absolutely.

from the article:

When we asked the AI to generate the Ngunnawal 'Dreamtime' image, it stated it would "design something in a 'safe zone' of respectful, generic dot-painting symbolism"

on the safe zone, right...

Ioannis

[richard]

Giving untrained, untalented people of little ability a tool to generate product that they can and will pass off as if its from a skilled source can only serve to undermine the value and skillset of the very things they have copied. The only people who shall reap long a term benefit are the sociopaths like Musk, Zuckerberg etc Philistines will rule. Where ultimately would the future value be in learning to Paint, Write, Draw, Program, Compose music, Act, Play a Piano ....?, best just learn a sport [professional of course] nobody will appreciate the 10,000 hours its takes to master any other skill. I'm just off to lie on the sofa and watch the AI generated NEWS and then AI generated football final, I might go outside tomorrow.

[richard]

and tonight footy will be great, Britain's top players of the last 100 years vs cuddly kittens in suits
such skill

[rsocor01]

Giving untrained, untalented people of little ability a tool to generate product that they can and will pass off as if its from a skilled source can only serve to undermine the value and skillset of the very things they have copied.

You nailed it here. I couldn't have explained it better.