18F series performance not so good?


Results 1 to 17 of 17

Threaded View

  1. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    457


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Default Re: 18F series performance not so good?

    Those extra instructions definitely make a difference. It's not just clock speed. If it takes more instructions to do the same thing then that's a disadvantage.

    That, plus even though the memory is still banked you don't have the horrible ram arrangement that the PIC16 suffers from, and no program memory page issues.
    The 18F has a hardware multiplier, dual-priority interrupts, more FSR registers.

    All in all, if you have a choice between 16F and 18F, 18F is the better choice. It'll produce faster code in a lot of instances.
    The only reasons I can think of to use a 16F might be price or perhaps power consumption.
    Last edited by tumbleweed; - 11th January 2023 at 23:22.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 7
    Last Post: - 21st September 2014, 01:59
  2. Moving on to 18F series.
    By Tina10 in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: - 4th September 2012, 05:50
  3. 18F series challenges
    By Charlie in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: - 23rd July 2011, 15:32
  4. 18f series chip locked up
    By glkosec in forum mel PIC BASIC Pro
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: - 11th August 2009, 07:27
  5. OT - Firefox browser - faster performance
    By malc-c in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: - 14th August 2006, 10:33

Members who have read this thread : 0

You do not have permission to view the list of names.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts