By clever selection of ADC resistors.
This had been solved long time ago, and not by me
|
Re: My code for ADC button handling, it works, but can it be slimmed down?
By clever selection of ADC resistors.
This had been solved long time ago, and not by me
|
Re: My code for ADC button handling, it works, but can it be slimmed down?
Recent posts got me thinking. Are you designing something with a bunch of buttons, each with a specific functionality? Or are you trying to do something more akin to a key pad? If you're using a standard key pad there are set-ups using resistors to create a narrow voltage range with the press of any individual key. That only requires one analog input to read any key press.
https://aws1.discourse-cdn.com/ardui...2_542x500.jpeg
|
Re: My code for ADC button handling, it works, but can it be slimmed down?
12 buttons is ok with 8 bit adc . with 16 the last row gets down to 2 or 3 counts separation , a bit close for comfort in my view
Warning I'm not a teacher
|
Re: My code for ADC button handling, it works, but can it be slimmed down?
At current stage, I'm looking for more efficient and small code
for ADC key handling.
|
Re: My code for ADC button handling, it works, but can it be slimmed down?
Doesn't post#2 with the use of Select Case do what you want with the least code/var usage?
Ioannis
|
Re: My code for ADC button handling, it works, but can it be slimmed down?
No it does not.
It does not do "do not repeat action until user releases and pushes key again"
|
Re: My code for ADC button handling, it works, but can it be slimmed down?
Something like that then?Code:if !flag then adcin 1, adcval 'read keys SELECT CASE adcval CASE < 10 : left=left+1:flag=1 'detect button presses CASE < 100 @ NOP CASE < 130 : right=right+1 :flag=1'detect button presses END SELECT endif
Ioannis
Last edited by Ioannis; - 7th January 2022 at 20:40.
Members who have read this thread : 0You do not have permission to view the list of names.
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks