Redefining HPWM as output

[mister_e]

what about if you place a LOW PORTB.2 after the last HPWM line???

EDIT: i think i need to sleep.. See Alain solution...

[Acetronics2]

Hi, Peterdeco

Melabs says : to stop HPWM : HPWM 1, 0, xxxx ( duty cycle to zero ! )

That's all !!!

Now, if you can decently explain what PBP does when you ask for 0 Hz freq ...

you could also disable the CCP1 module ... but why ???

Alain

[picnaut]

Hi,

Do you have to change the frequency to zero?
I wouldn't.
Anything below the minimum allowed frequency can cause strange results with the HPWM command.
I think if you simply issue the command at the frequency you've been using, but at a 0% duty cycle, it will be solid OFF. If you issue the command with a 100% duty cycle (255 if 8-bit) it will be solid ON.

Does anybody see any problem with this approach?

Regards,

[mister_e]

Does anybody see any problem with this approach?

Can't say... i never use HPWM. Still prefer to write directly to the internal register. BUT, as Alain said and AS per the book

Dutycycle specifies the on/off (high/low) ratio of the signal. It ranges from 0 to 255, where 0 is off (low all the time) and 255 is on (high) all the time.

[Bruce]

If you want to turn OFF hardware PWM & have a solid logic output on the CCP pin, don't rely on using the HPWM command with a zero duty-cycle. Just use CCP1CON = 0 to disable the PWM module, then set/clear the pin as required.

After clearing CCP1CON, you can simply issue the HPWM command again, and PBP will automatically configure CCP1CON for PWM mode.

Some I/O-pins are multiplexed with peripherals. When these peripherals are enabled, they may "override" the TRIS bit for a pin. Even though the HPWM command does leave the TRIS bit set to output, and it leaves a zero in the output latch, if the PWM module is still enabled, and not outputting a PWM signal, you'll see a high impedance on the CCP output pin.

[Acetronics2]

Hi,

I think if you simply issue the command at the frequency you've been using, but at a 0% duty cycle, it will be solid OFF. If you issue the command with a 100% duty cycle (255 if 8-bit) it will be solid ON.

Does anybody see any problem with this approach?

Regards,

Hi, Picnaut

this approach runs perfectly well, and it is recommended by Melabs itself ...as I use HPWM for R/C E-motors , I just clear CCP1CON when I'm not really really sure a glitch could give a false value to duty cycle. ( never saw it ...but i'm sure !!! )

Alain

[peterdeco1]

Thank you Everybody. Bruce, I did the CCP1CON = 0 thing in place of my "zero frequency" command and it works like a charm.

[picnaut]

Bruce's approach sounds better to me.
It probably uses less code than issuing the HPWM command again also.

Cheers.

[Bruce]

Here's a simple test to show the effects of disabling the hardware PWM module, or using a zero duty-cycle or freq with HPWM.

Hook an LED up to your CCP out pin.

CCP output pin ---|>|----/\/\/\/\----GND

SYMBOL PIN = PORTC.2 ' Define whatever pin on your PIC is CCP out here

    HPWM 1,127,2000
    PAUSE 8000
    CCP1CON = 0 ' Test once with this, then comment it out
    'HPWM 1,0,0  ' Now test with this un-commented
    
WAITUP: 
    HIGH PIN
    PAUSE 500
    LOW PIN
    PAUSE 500
    GOTO WAITUP

On a 16F876A, the LED never toggles with HPWM 1,0,0. It does once the hardware PWM module is disabled with CCP1CON = 0. I'm curious if it works either way on other PIC's.