
Originally Posted by
picnaut
Hi,
I think if you simply issue the command at the frequency you've been using, but at a 0% duty cycle, it will be solid OFF. If you issue the command with a 100% duty cycle (255 if 8-bit) it will be solid ON.
Does anybody see any problem with this approach?
Regards,
Hi, Picnaut
this approach runs perfectly well, and it is recommended by Melabs itself ...as I use HPWM for R/C E-motors , I just clear CCP1CON when I'm not really really sure a glitch could give a false value to duty cycle. ( never saw it ...but i'm sure !!! )
Alain
************************************************** ***********************
Why insist on using 32 Bits when you're not even able to deal with the first 8 ones ??? ehhhhhh ...
************************************************** ***********************
IF there is the word "Problem" in your question ...
certainly the answer is " RTFM " or " RTFDataSheet " !!!
*****************************************
Bookmarks